And I tend to stay away from baked goods . At my age it settles on the midsection
It's really annoying to see the same people who never believe any woman's claim of harassment or assault not hesitate to throw the book at this woman. She deserves to have the book thrown at her. If you don't support as harsh of a punishment for the men that actually do this, you're a hypocrite.
Deworming from parasites is always stupid - from parasites' perspective.
We?re taught to question EVERYTHING. You?ve obviously have never been a Catholics. Many Catholics complain about the amount of knowledge we?re required to obtain. And the only way to obtain knowledge is to question things. Plus Fides et Ratio... already covered this one. What else ya got?
"Christians are the true Atheists"
It does show that.
1. Agreed that it would help, but for many people it's still less about access and more about mentality. The issue here is I don't think I have the right to stop others from wrecking their bodies if they choose, yet I don't want to pay for the effects it has on healthcare. Keeping it taboo at least discourages people from taking it too lightly.
Not if you start with the conclusion that it couldn't be a horrible book...
The reason why is simple- because I gather from this dialogue that it is you who wishes to take a position of dishonesty and as a result I have little interest in what you think.
Ah, thanks, I did miss that. You do realize that this document was written in the 6th or 7th Century and that almost no Christians accept this documents historicity? To call it a "Christian source" is a stretch. It's a source that very, very few Christians take seriously.
I already showed evidence minus the proof no one gets that till I am properly acredited for my work.
Good point. Having a baby is no guarantee he will stay with you anyway.
Scam artists decidedly not Christian.
No, and I admit I have not explained well. Our perspective is limited to viewing time in one direction. That does not mean that time itself is limited, or that our perspective is any more valid than one which views time in reverse. Cause and effect may not be a one-way street.
Yes, and soon religion will be destroyed. Then salvation for them ends.
"I guess the scientists working on this don't know what they're talking about, and you know better? |-D"
Our system was set up to prevent a single zealot from enacting their beliefs on others. What we have right now however is nearly two-thirds of the states + 2.5 out of 3 branches of government all following the same religion. Which isn't a problem - until they make it clear that their intent is to impose that religion on non-believers. That explicitly goes against the underpinnings of American law & our professed value of equality for all.
My taco is always perfect and delicious, thank you for asking.
I'm pretty sure excessive braiding and excessive use of "products" as a teenager contributed to me being mostly bald by time i hit 32. You raise a good point- she might like how the cut looks now... but cutting it that way repeatedly for a period of time may be unhealthy for future growth.
Yep. I agree
*When your 8:30am meeting you're not ready for gets pushed to 3pm*
Asking questions to set up a hypothesis is not trolling.
Overall, violent crime has been steadily decreasing since the 1980's.
I think no such thing.
There was a woman truck driver whose boss tried to rape her. Her company and the police did nothing. She walks around with a knife. Most women in that field do. She talked to male drivers who feel safe and don't carry anything.
Maybe her rich friends can help pay.