No its elimination of the accountability. You are no longer obligated to anything once you killed that fetus. No longer obligated to care for it, change its diaper, teach it, raise it...all those obligations are gone. You didn't fulfill your accountability you executed the person you were obligated to. Kinda like being accountable to your parents in old age by smothering them with a pillow lol. the moral reasoning of the left is thoroughly broken.
No, there is no test. Period. You can believe in the Christian God and identify as a Christian. Which they did. Sorry if that bothers you.
I don't know what you're talking about.
Explaining the implication of a creator requires no leap, Bernard :
First time to hear of this image requirement. Any suggestions?
Unfortunately at the same time men put their desire ahead of what is most likely taught, hence the conflicts.
Augustine of Hippo is the root cause of much that is wrong with Christianity, see his thoughts on Original Sin for example. (From Wikipedia)
As you wish. I don't need to win this thing.
That's because there isn't a wimp in the White House anymore and they're crying in their beer because they can't influence Trump like they could Odummy.
Most "fast food" isn't exactly good for you.
Being owned by a Christian doesn't make it Church run. Your point was the Church run.
I wrote an essays several years ago finding 7 foci of Christian thought or belief. They were Arian, Orthodox (diphysite), Monophysite, Nestorian, Calvinist, Arminian, and Anabaptist.
I ain't no Bama...lol.
The western economy pal. Everyone was climbing out.
The bible is not true then!
> I would submit that an absence of evidence is generally, evidence of absence.
Because I'm human and a part of society. Because the reward I get for doing the right thing is more substantial than some ephemeral promise of a non existent afterlife.
I told you...by faith. That's consistent with the text, my faith. And it was hardly ad hom, relax.
It doesn?t really affect anything and it isn?t that surprising really after putting some thought into it. And of course this is living species not discussing the precursors to the living ones.
Not really. Stalin did address (with his usual brutal methods) issues that are in moral realm, but to the best of my knowledge, he never went as far as build a unified set of morals to be codified. Soviet morality as in "Codex of builders of communism" came around 60's.
yup, exactly like Wynne and Horwath. If you think otherwise, you're delusional.
skip struggles with facts
I don't think that at all. I know it's the devil. He just happens to be the god of this world. The Israelites were Gods chosen partners to pass on the knowledge of God, but look ate their record. Why so bad? Because they kept rebelling...getting away from God. That's it you know. It's not being with God in heart. Atheists ate faaar from it. But if it makes you feel better, religious are even further from God. Religious murdered Christ. Right? The title of the book is covenant or partnership with God. Good hint...get and stay close to God, few did and do. That's the way to change it all.
In related news...
After you have given every option possible, you would not let your children make their choices? If your child insisted on doing meth and not getting help and not trying to get off, would you continue to plead with them to get off meth, or you would you let them accept the consequence of their actionsl
So, it shows to the people who hold that new moral standard, that the old one was not objective.