Nope, Judges, who ignores the teachings of their personal faith and went with the US constitution, not their religion.
Sorry about your culinary limitations.
Right, if we stop thinking about it at being a criminal, then we can equate being a murderer to shop lifting bread to feed your kids.
Leftists "think" with an organ that was designed to pump blood!
This is Pastor Steve Furtick's house:
"....fathom what it means"...
I'm pretty sure the villification of Hillary had an effect.
I have. I bet you haven't though. Because the seven year thing, male Hebrew slaves only. Female Hebrews, non-Hebrews, those born into slavery, they didn't have the freedom aspect. You could also beat your slave so as long as they don't die in a day or two. While there are worse forms of slavery, that doesn't give the Biblical god any moral standing when he is also condoning it.
I am not playing your goalpost shift son
<------Itchy butt maker
Thoughtful post mate as usual.
.......aaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnndddddddddddd someone swooped in before us.
You are looking at those cases with what you want to see instead of observing that character of the court and the trajectory of the decisions. While each of those decisions may appear narrow, it tells us how the court views those entities.
Oh, the humanities!
This religious crap reminds me of a song by the Bee Gees around 1968. It was called I started a Joke.
OK, keep on looking at clouds...
Oh! You mean that unchristian conduct marks the perpetrator a Christian?
Changed the world? Not exactly. Took philosophy that already existed, then repackaged into a cult, then changed over time to herd human minds into gullible followers of alpha type males so they can take advantage of them is more like it.
That's a topic that just kills me. I hear so often from a Trump supporter how the Media tells lies about Trump, yet almost every single subject that they try to deny is backed up by audio and video.
FAR BETTER than the 'alternative'
That wasn't a "civil" war, the South did not want control of the entire country.
No it isn't what?
It beats last place and golfing.
That's not the case here though. In these situations, the kids are sent to foster care system, not cages.
"Again, post the citations to the peer-reviewed scientific research published in scientific refereed journals THAT FALSIFIES THE AGE OF THE EARTH. Or admit you're lying.". [emphasis added] Now, admit that you're lying.
I get it but look at the extremes
Is this the assault on reasoning I think it is or am I too stoned on pot right now?
If a parent doesnt want their child participating in an LGBT class that will teach LGBT topics, I dont understand why you would have a problem with that and then turn it into "they are opting out treating students with dignity and respect". Like I said, if were going to make it a "dignity and respect" assembly or a "anti bullying" assembly the main theme should not be LGBT (with pronoun usage, sexual attraction and gender dysphoria commentry)...make it so that every kid of every color, sex, sexual orientation, religion and background can relate. If thats what this is really about "acceptance" it should be broad "kids, we should accept ALL people regardless of their choices, religious, sex etc"
BTW, I would be very surprised if by 2168 humanity doesn't have the ability to casually tweak human genes to produce the necessary diversity to avoid the genetic bottleneck.
Tyranny of the majority is not an excuse to 'just go with it.' Sorry. It doens't matter if the majority of people agree with something. What matters is if it's Constitutional and whether or not it infringes on individual rights. If so, to what extent? You're correct; we should absolutely challenge those laws by voting, voicing opinions and every legal avenue available to us as citizens.