Too much financial disparity could be awkward. I would have no interest in being a "sugar daddy," and I'd be a pretty poor choice as one. :-)
Good. No one is going to defend this jackass.
I'm sorry to hear about your situation. That sounds extremely difficult to live with, but I do hope you would try counseling for such communication issues before splitting (especially if there's children). A therapist might be able to help your spouse learn how to accept constructive criticism and stop blaming others when things go wrong. Likewise, he could help you discover better ways to open communication and deliver criticism to others in ways they can accept (everyone is different), which will be helpful to you both even if you don't remain together.
That would be a start.
Is trolling for you a hobby or a habit?
"I don't believe the state has any right or interest in whether a conception is carried to term. I would expand that to substances used for recreational purposes and euthanasia."
And monkeys may well fly from my butt.
Pithy Wititude Region Rat.... Do you think when I was referring to the ignorant posting in a free country that I was referring too you??? Wow... Someone has a low self esteem!! But hey if you think stones can tell you the future, and trees speak to you with the knowledge of the universe.. And that statues answer prayers... Or speak back.... And that cutting yourself with a knife is not going to wind you up with some type of serious medical problem... How can anyone debate with a person like that???
Simply put, naturalism provides a much better explanation that matches observation than theism.
I do that on the weekend too. "I have plans." Plans to go to the movies alone and then take my dog for a hike. But they are still plans.
You brought it up in the first place.
Then tell me what you think it is when god said he would kill those children and then did it.
I am not going to do your homework for you. You made the claim, you support it.
No, don?t think I do.
But I won't ever need to because I haven't done anything wrong.
It's not or is more healthy now?
I provided many cogent examples, the rest is up to you.
My uncle another attorney just called to tell me if they balk on anything to come to him as well
If you believe that your God is the Creator, then how can you turn away from a gay or lesbian person in any way. God made all of His children, right? And Jesus said, "My father says that His house has many rooms." What does that mean? Does it mean heaven is huge? Does it mean God has love enough for all? I think it's closer to the second one. And if God loves all of His children, who are we to judge? I mean, you don't have it direct from God that these people aren't really quite up to snuff, do you? And is it reproduction you're talking about? I stumped a priest with this and I'll share it with you. If procreation is what keeps homosexuals at odds with the church, then let us sort out all of those heterosexual couples who married but never had children and put them with the homosexuals because they're not making babies either.
- Just throwing this out there - the bit about not having original manuscripts and so on is not at all unique to the New Testament - we don't have the original manuscripts for almost any writing from this time period - most of what we have are just later copies, very often from centuries later, and when we have multiple copies, there are often textual variants. This is why textual criticism is important for *all* ancient writings, not just the New Testament.
I'm not surprised. I read somewhere that the USA is the most litigious country in the world.
UPVOTED FIFTY TIMES!
Did you read what you wrote? How can you know what a Christian is? How can you know the will of God?
I think this would be relevant if it were like... 1999 or 2000. But in this day and age, it's pretty normal to make and meet online friends irl. Maybe see if he could drop her off and she could briefly introduce them to him before he made his exit.
I asked, but TFCC has so far not given a single concrete example of how this relates to the Religion channel. The only claim is that it somehow establishes authenticity for "settlement sites", although I'm not sure how a 20 year correction in the time range changes anything.
The problem with this becomes there is a subset of society, particularly in the contemporary academic world, that rejects the very notion of objective "facts". They are willing to dispense with fact, in preference to the narrative they seek to push.
When he says, "Mr. President," he's referring to the person residing over the Senate for that day. Just fyi.
omfg homeschool has only been in session for an hour and he's already stressing me the f*ck out.
You don?t get to defend dotty old racists by saying racism is meaningless. He is a racist piece of human garbage. I?m sorry that makes you mad snowflake, it?s just the truth.
As an atheist, I would be just as interested, if not more, in arguments that upset theists. Arguments that don't live up to logic, especially.