I did actually say the coin is biased. Think it was Adams thinking it wasn't.
I have had MANY excellent and respectful conversations with theists. Nothing says we have to agree to share ideas
Yep The first thing you do when you buy something is ask what is the price
One night with Adam Levine?
Haha. I dont think it happened with food.
What's your plan, force people on welfare to go pick vegetables and make that their only option? Given any other option, Americans are not going to choose to do back breaking labor. You are delusional.
Ever ask why? The why is the important part
I think social shaming began with the social justice warriors of the Left. Any one could have told them that this was a very very bad precedent, but they don't care.
My fault then.
Nothing to do with President Obama. Your buddy trump is the self-proclaimed "law and order" president is the one who ran his mouth about "enforcing all the laws."
Who is Brabbas?
But it doesn't say his breath is the Holy spirit there. It is inconsistent. If you have to go to 100 different parts of the Bible to get your meaning that means that it isn't stated there as you claim.
probably works for him a few times out of each 10 attempts
I understand what you are saying and I know the RCC is a favourite whipping boy. I really do understand that.
I made a zangie garni this week, called blatjang. It is South African in origin. Has dried apricots and raisins, onions, garlic, slivered almonds, vinegar, brown sugar and spices including ginger and chili powder. It's quite good, definitely zangie.
You're still referring to 1) Jesus telling a parable, not a literal. A story. And 2) NOT a literal sword. A metaphor.
You say ?first man or first woman?
A myth is an unproven story that usually takes in the supernatural and is written to explain that which you cannot understand. I believe in the creation story. That's my mythology. I have no other way to explain it so I go with the story. I know it is not true as written. My story is two or three chapters. Your unproven supernatural story goes on for hundreds of pages.
Every single Christian on the planet does that in some form or another.
Not attempting a strawman. Sincerely. Just came to this conclusion after reading several of your questions/statements.
Not currently in the mood to spend hours upon hours reading the blog and going into a point-by-point of all the claims being made here. This is all I'll say:
There was no assumption, I quoted it directly. I even italicized it so it was easy to see and realize that those are your words.
We can start with Biological information. DNA is essentially complex computer code. Computer code is designed by intelligence, it is highly improbable that random chance and mutation can account for the massive variations in even a simple system let alone man. Lets break down the time like the Universe is 12-13 billion years old, the earth is about 5 billion years old, simple celled life is about 3.8 billion years old. Complex life is about 541 million years old and human life is about 200,000 years old. So it takes a great leap of faith to believe that all the complex systems in the human body arose in about 539 million years. Lets look at it this way random mutation as it observed today is rarely beneficial to the organism. That is not to say it never happen microevolution does happen and can be beneficial to the organism. But there is no evidence that can be observed today that suggest macro evolution is beneficial. We then have to account for the Cambrian explosion, all major Phyla groups in 30 million years. That is exceptionally fast in evolutionary time scale. So what is my point? given the time frames it is highly improbable that successive generations of beneficial mutations have the ability to create all genetic information on earth. This becomes evolution of the gaps because assumptions and creative time frames have to be created for evolutionary time frames to work. Even in Occam's razor- is the problem-solving principle that, when presented with competing hypothetical answers to a problem, one should select the answer that makes the fewest assumptions. Where is the simple explanation possible creation or evolution? This whole debate is about evidence and if there is enough evidence to continue to confirm evolution and its ability to create complex genetic information through random chance and mutation. The ability of Evolution to explain the world in 1859 was ground breaking but we are now 159 years past his theory and science has not been kind to his theory. What we know about DNA was just not available to Darwin at the time, But as we realize the massive complexity of this genetic computer system the less likely is becomes chance and mutation is the answer.
So you have nothing
When you have shitty kids you don't drown them and try again. The Christian god is a monster worse than any found in other fictional writing.
What? Lol, how so? It keeps changing for one. How hard is it to find Europe? Now its at what...7-10 thou years? Advent of agriculture?
Well, it took the whole of 3 days for this to happen:
Youre an idiot.
We don?t need a crutch. You must admit, we who are strong believers
So you are just trying to force your moral judgements about how you think people should behave on others .. That is the very opposite of supporting freedom and liberty isn't it ?
I guess so, that is why I am asking you for any bible verse that gives any credence to the plot you claim exist.
I commented -don?t see it?
They didn't. Plunder was the most common. Then probably subjugation. Then slavery. Then mass murder.
Really? You read my comment?