Fair enough. I love you too.
In Canada the oral traditions of the First Nations are taken seriously enough to justify legal claims to lands which had otherwise been seized by the government and overlooked in treaty negotiations (or in BC, where treaty negotiations happened after establishment of the province.)
The comment was about religion and liberty without any reference to any country. I know you might have a hard time believing this, being completely American-centric, but you know that liberty doesn't stop at the US border, right?
I realize that minorities get treated like sht in trump country, yes. Trying to prove otherwise is laughable.
Or in other words...
General Lee was not the better man, in my opinion. Lincoln is the greatest President we have ever had.
Enjoy the cultural diversity and restaurants if the roads allow or the vibrancy isn't too vibrant.
Of course you aren't even satisfied when Trudeau concedes something to your Dear Leader? proxy, like you've been begging him to do. Comrade.
I agree Horvath is going to cost. At least she is letting people know where she stands.
LMFAO!! I've seen those around. My favorite one is her outside the window of the Oval office with Barack sitting at the desk and the caption is "Police, I would like to report a black man in the Oval office. Come quick."
Notice how that does not invite you to stick your nose into their private lives, including your self-invitation to try to deny them the blessings of defining their own families: "When LBGT advocates began seeking to change the definition of marriage to accommodate their desires this essentially forced everyone else to take a position." How LGBTQ define their families and their relationships has zero bearing on you and your life, except when you self-invite yourself to get into the middle of their lives. Trying to block their civil rights to determine their own futures goes a lot farther that what Thessalonians gives you permission to do. You are plain done and out of "commission" when you finish expressing your personal objection to their values. Nothing in that verse or any other gives you permission to interfere in their actual lives or rights. If you do, you invite legal and political retaliation and any that comes your way will be well-deserved.
The case wasn?t decided on anything other than the behavior of the Commission, close enough since what they wanted decide wasn?t.
No - it says that history, by its nature, cannot be concerned with the supernatural. In the case of history, we must assume a natural cause for everything - otherwise it is useless. Would you accept any history which contained non-Christian (or Jewish) miracles? Do you think that the parts of the Iliad where the gods directly intervene are historical?
I'm not Jesus... But I drank "Purple Jesus's" when I was a teenager...
All my friend's weddings had tons of single people there...now that is no guarantee they will like you but they were there
That's because you can't see period.
Gah! Must... solve... puzzles!
I guess I don't see the point in even mentioning it??. But take care.
Well in my opinion? After 40 years of studying these religions? Christianity has Islam beat by miles in the historical persecution and slaughter and genocides of others through their wars, Inquisitions, Crusades (there were 14 Crusades, only 4 of them dealt with Jerusalem, the rest were Crusades against Pagans and Jews as well as fellow Christians), their mass genocide of the Native Americans, their support and defense of slavery in the US and other countries, etc.
Yep. And you being a Jew we have the same Truth. God is a Living God. And He is there for those that accept Him as the God of Abraham. And the people of God has to accept everybody that accepts the God of Abraham.
There is a factual link from Marxism to atheism
Cool, so we don?t have to look for unicorns anymore
No he shouldn't. That's humiliating.
uhhhhhh.... WHAT? What on earth was wrong with what I said?
Usa up all night lol
When is Trump going to wake up and realize that he can't bully everybody into seeing eye to eye with his extreme views on trade issues. Sure, his tariffs help a few people, but in the long run, they will do much more harm than good. Higher prices, loss of production, loss of jobs will far outweigh any benefits he sees from his uncompromising approach.
There's nothing cringy about that post. If RR has any knowledge of Christianity and I think she does, she will know exactly what he's talking about. She may no longer agree. But she knows.
Morals are subjective. What is moral to us is not moral to someone else. I read an interesting analysis of the Germans and ethics. The Germans did not become unethical in their approach to the Jews. Instead they accepted a new ethic in which eliminating the Jews became the new morality however distasteful it was to them.
Yeah when I see the super skinny young'uns being spiteful about weight I want to follow up with them again when their metabolism has tanked with age.
I only remember two biased fans not being able to take other peoples opinions very well. One is gone and the other claims to be leaving.