c'mon man. She's a cunning linguist
You are up and down this threat attacking science and suggesting the pure pout lie that is the biblical claim of 6000 year old earth is in the same level as real freaking science. We know for fact its not, we know things are older then 6k years old.
I have little love for the evangelical crowd, but that is incorrect in my experience.
You obviously don't know what legal precedent is.
Little known fact - the kkk supported minimum wage laws to keep people from employing black Americans.
meh, nice troll bait. Christianity is paganism. Christianity ended slavery in Europe and America and also argued convincingly in favor of slavery, Christianity would have won out either way because it was on both sides of the argument. which moral principles are you referring to? it would be silly to claim that Judeo-Christian values didn't influence western law. and yet in the states the first amendment explicitly gives "the finger" to the first 4 commandments. hell only 6,8 and 9 under oath are even illegal. almost nothing of jesus teaching is illegal, so we dismiss most of our Judeo-Christian values. That would make us the guarantors of our morality.
So thsts how the cool kids talk nowadays??????
There's good precedent for "you must have this program in place, or its equivalent" through Quebec programs. Supreme Court won't have a problem with it.
Isn't your post just an example of what whiny liberals like to call "whataboutism"?
There was none, legally. and biology does not agree with you. But you lied about this before. After all, according to you male giving another male a blowjob is not a homosexual act
Your fweewings are hurt, LOL!
Is it blasphemy to not believe in God? Are you being blasphemous towards every god you do not believe in?
I am glad you aren't interested in discussing of my reasoning #1. So you concede your initial point, then?
False. God does NOT kill people as you describe it. God executes His judgment upon society, which is His right.
You're right. I was thinking of Buddhism.
I only took them because I thought they were fives.??
Well, I suspect that if you dig into this study you'll find that it wasn't speculation but simply an assumption before evidence had been gathered in that area.
I call them dummies.
Lol, you could tell me that Obama was a good president a hundred times, I would never agree.
Whatever you want to call that wedding, religious or political, the important thing is it's OVER. Thank God or thank the stars or whatever.
gang violence is not the same as mass shooters, you are being dishonest trying to conflate the two. gang violence there is usually motives that arise over turf or other gang disputes, bystanders may get caught in the conflict but they are not the main focus of the attacks. Mass shooters are different both bystanders and specific targets are considered fair game as their motivation often centers around the destructive power and randomness of the attack
Would they mark it as correct and if I missed enough, would they give a passing grade? It is right or it is wrong and we are judged for our works. If you don't know the truth, then it is best if you don't say anything - evolution is a perfect example of making false statements and coming back with "we have more evidence and have to change our previous analysis" and they did not have the proof for their first statement and likely are making another false statement.
More bullshit lies. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Same, CRSPR could probably do a lot to help with that especially after it advances more.
Yes, you would know. You MUST be looking in the mirror.
Hysterical, melodramatic nonsense. I can go buy a Bible from Barnes and Noble right now and no one will get sued or hauled off to jail for it. You don't have to change someone's sexual orientation to help them change their behavior.
Moses thinks so....YES!
"Why not consider...Goddidit once more?"
This was your statement.