Now, maybe you can see why the Southern Wall is needed.
I'm sure that not even Joshua could do that.
also commonsense, a characteristic even rarer.
Im not talking about the first Amendment.
Monique judge comes to mind. Need more?
Nothing compelled about it, the business freely invited the public, ie everyone, to come by pre-orderable, customer-customizable standard wedding cake designs without discrimination because of their beliefs - including those surrounding marriage, their sexes, or sexual orientations.
I see the problem
Remember when you made excuses for priests who fucked boys?
The liberals believe in in the principles of Democracy?
Romans 8 says no men are without excuse for not knowing god. Of course, that was before anyone in the Middle East knew the world was round and populated with unknown indigenous populations. So, can?t hold the author accountable for that I suppose.
See? At least you?re being honest.
Nunyen Sung would be proud the Data is still held in such high regard!
neither do I, that is why I asked.... dummy... lol
It will be pretty easy to overturn once Trump has a few more judges appointed.
I hope they blasted the paint off that first.
I think in the context it was quite obvious that I was using the word 'related' in that way.
Carbon dating got verified by other methods. We're talking about +-20 years over several millennia. I would call it quite reliable.
You are a fan of scat play?
>>"Through the will of the people, via their elected legislators, they put an amendment on their constitution that marriage in that state shall be between one man and one woman."<<
Care to provide the mainstream, peer-reviewed material attesting to the existence of random number generators in species or indicating that "information" somehow "gets into" the genomes. Your alleged qualifications in engineering are hardly sufficient. Now spare us your cheap, dishonest composition fallacy.
She is part of a cult, but it seems to be something you can't save her from. Think of it as a terminal disease. She needs to cut that tumor out herself. It's going to hurt, but she needs to decide for herself that there's more to life than what the cult church is offering, and then she can decide for herself what she wants. That said, if she's actually decided to try to think for herself, and you're sure she's not testing you, feel free to help her see the characteristics of her church that scream cult to you.
Ok so you are on to something but when did the first creative act occur? In this text or after?
Perhaps (at least some of them) should be thanked for their service (eg. helping them sharpen their cognitive skills) to their fellow human.
reality is reality.
Nope !! And if you hear any different, they are lying to you !
There better be vodka in that :p
Our democracy allows us the luxury of disagreeing with each other. Thats only fair.
I'm just saying be careful of what you claim when attempting to tie morality to religious self identification in prison, because it can come off the wrong way.
Or, at least, wishful thinking.
Does it need to? Then you'll need to show me that ALL children of heterosexuals are heterosexual.
I agree James, yet when it comes down to actual reality, we all must be painfully honest with the facts. How we may 'feel' about it is a secondary issue, along with 'what if people don't like me if I say what I really think.'