Let me correct your statement...
The economy depends on production, not consumption. Yours is the supply side fallacy.
Agree. This is the kind of thing where if the motivation and social awareness to realize he's expected to do it are there... he'd have probably done it already. Not super different from expecting a random guy to ask for a date.
I see. And what manner of epistemology do you think you?re using in addressing me in such a non-Scientific specialist manner? It is not framed in terms of a verifiable/falsifiable format which can be tested in a laboratory. Duh.
It's simply fraud.
who cares? cant we all just rag on this lady together as a happy family?
Melons is a woman, not a "women", but thanks for letting your "intelligence" of how to use proper English slip, slide...away. (It's) so hilarious you NEED to paint yourself as a victim here, when you rant & lie about everyone else. WOW, you're funny.
My point isn't about whether the person is indictable for their actions. It's about whether a religion (or irreligion) is indictable for the actions of individuals who may use that religion or irreligion to justify atrocities.
When a baby is crying... that means it wants its diaper changed moron!
Bigotry may not be a state of moral wrongness.
They are pedophiles.
Many Christians and atheists alike will accuse you of "picking and choosing." May I remind everyone that we all pick and choose. Even a biblical literalist will tell you it's all literal except the stuff that isn't.
The squeaky wheel gets the oil, right? Guess I will just have to do that then. Thanks for the info! ;) xoxo
But you did. And that you can't see it means you're even more deluded than I'd imagined.
those are administrative authorities.
There are many possibilities. Quantum fluctuation seems most likely unless string theory can be proven. IMVHO the Abrahamic deity would be rather unlikely if his fan fiction is accurate. Earth before stars?
If you know anything about the ideological conflict going on in the Western universities currently, I would even venture to suggest that it's not merely "unjust retribution", but a "planned and crafted retribution".
What do you think about the books on the Loch Ness monster?
Things change. The bible has to reflect that fact.
It would still be a lack of belief.
Sure not in a single sentence like that, obviously. Still an accurate paraphrasing of Trump supporters positions.
how could you became an atheist
Don't knock it 'till you've tried it.
Well Brad and I have asked you to explain some of the things you've claimed (scientific method, nullifying evolutionary theory) but you've not. Which you've done before with me when we've conversed, so I could throw the 'denial' argument back at you