Yep, likely legal in his state sadly
1. As opposed to answers that are wrong? yes it matters and no religion doesn't do any of that. If anything it muddies the water.
Going for the "kinder, gentler" approach!
Here are the references:
No, I haven't seen the news today. Enlighten me.
You are correct.
Of course I got that. Whatever would make you think I didn't?
I often see tiny puppies, chis usually, that are dragged around by kids too young to know better and look miserable. Some just look sick, and I want to go all PETA on them.
"I ain't got no books" conveys substance. The two go together.
Sane Guy's probably backing the "Christine Elliot Palace Coup" wish at the moment.
Not among my friends. Men are to blame for everything. They say it so often I am having sympathy for the devil.
Not literally the first man and first woman, just, the first "man and woman" of this religious group.
I am agnostic on all matters that have not been resolved or that cannot be resolved.
You are entitled to your opinion. Oh, and isn't it ironic that you call him a name and denigrate his SiL.
The go to non religious one tends to be "its unnatural" or "they can't reproduce" or "it goes against natural law" which neither of those are good reasons since it is nature, they rarely explain why it goes against "natural law" and they don't tend to take a stance against hetero couples who can't have kids having sex.
Mark can speak for himself.
Islam always gets a free pass.
History shows Catholicism held back science, in the case of Galileo, and of Bruno, and the Lutherans with Kepler. It does not show that the Greek and Russian Orthodox
You get upset science busts the myths in the bible so need to attack it. we all saw what you were trying to do here.
But I wanna debate the topic that wasn?t up for debate and I don?t wanna start a separate thread about it so I don?t derail someone?s topic!!! Waaaaaaaaaaahhh!!!!!
He worked with them, hence his opnion from what I gather, he also has assocites who probably do, it's part of the profession.