"These are all normally 'good' people."
Too true. You think "I may not have the connections of Meghan Markle but I could have your balls crushed in an instant"
There in lies the question, What evidence do you require to believe in the supernatural? In the end there is evidence for and against its comes down to our personal threshold for belief. In my research and opinion I am convinced by the evidence, where as I assume in your case the evidence has not crossed your belief threshold. This leads to the next question if you presented with enough evidence to cross your personal belief threshold would you then believe?
This one is so weird. It's one of the atomic clocks. This other coworker went to pick it up and hit a button or something. Lost time and date. You're supposed to be able to manually set it, but nothing worked yesterday.
When Matt Shurka accused the late Dr. Joe Nicolosi of "abusive" therapy, Nicolosi's son, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi Jr. encouraged him to subpoena his father's records. Do you really think Nicolosi Jr. would do that if the wasn't confident that Shurka's testimony was false?
Yes. Evolution is an unproven, 150-year old hypothesis. It's never been observed in nature. Darwin himself said that if any future discoveries could show that successive, gradual changes could not lead to speciation , then his theory would disintegrate. Well, you realize that Darwin knew nothing about cells, right? They weren't discovered in the 1850's. FYI, I have a BSci in Zoology. I've worked in the scientific field for 20+ years. You?
You're purposefully ignoring the other parts I already provided.
Good for him that he has achieved that kind of flexibility.
I hope you have seen an MD to rule out/address any organic issues that maybe impacting your well being. You are worth taking the best care of yourself.
That is your view and you are welcome to it. You do not get to claim it as a fact until you can prove it is correct to others.
Not my fault the bible proves God doesn't bless freedoms.
Look it up 5x trump cried bone spurs.
You were alluding to the heinous reference to Africans as being tribal. I merely backed up the fact that maybe their tribal association maybe was justified. You have added further evidence. (Thank you for that.)