I'm sure you will be fine. :)
Well, if those are FACTS, why hasn't Mueller used them to take down the administration! If it's so provable, what the eff have they been doing for 18
A. A meme is not logic.
That's a non-sequitur.
Google justin trudeau or soy boys
Are you sure it's Thursday?
And Jesus taught that people need to engage in spiritual growth training to experience better the meaning of "what has to exist." Freud, who softened up on his anti-theism, led a legacy that confirmed the significance of and advanced the understanding of Jesus? emphasis on "Seeking the Kingdom of God first / Taking the plank out of your own eye.... / become like a child..." Jung, Adler, and Assagioli were three in the next generation who had distinctly positive approaches to spirituality in Therapeutic Psychology, foreshadowing the founding of the Transpersonal subdiscipline.
Perhaps, but it's a leer or a stare if biology wins, and an appreciative glance if cognition wins (but doesn't mind admitting that biology makes a good point).
True, but there is no admonition in scripture against such activity, so the community is divided. Some churches, like the Catholics send a mixed message (such activity is ok so long as it is not the result, that the act ends in intercourse) others do "go after" anyone who indulges, others - like my church hold that any joyful and welcome sexual expression in marriage is fine.
Yeah, actually, they are.
Well, they would be [mutually exclusive] for me. But then again, I'd have to rethink the whole concept of science if it turned out that Darwin was right. But he wasn't. I get that the evolution community is pretty damned intimidating, but I'm a pretty technically sophisticated person (well, I am, what am I supposed to say?) and I don't have to take their word for it. And there's really no way that life became what it is today through a long sequence of random mutations. It's a nonsense concept. It's nonsensical at first glance, and it's nonsensical when carefully examined. Trust you common sense. Don't let anyone intimidate you into seeing the emperor's clothes when you know he isn't wearing any.
He should seriously be black listed and never be able to work in that industry in any way ever again.This a fvcked up thing to do
i know their just awful these days, wish they'd go back to moonlight ladies
LOL promises promises
How many 8-month old fetuses have been aborted in the past 5 years for anything other than extreme medical emergencies?
The first amendment guarantees our right to free expression. My driving habits are a form of speech!
How many times has Black Flag changed its formula within the last fifty or so years and why? What accounts for nylonase and super bugs? Ever heard of the e coli experiment which is still ongoing after over a decade? What about Dr. Endler's work on guppies. And while we're at it, how about a rundown of your scientific qualifications, including education, experience, fields of specialty and contributions to mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific publications. Without these, you are incompetent to opine on evolution, much less any scientific matter.
Have a serious LOL'ing going on here! :D
Amazing that you think you can read my mind. Just one more of your delusions.
What Do You Think Of The Islamic Doctrine
My atheism is not even tangentially linked to the TOE, and I don't consider it to be any sort of disproof of god(s) if you take creation stories to be metaphorical. Hell, it fits very well into a Deist's universe.
"Does a cause precede a reaction?"
Plenty of us may well be. But if, like me, one doesn't want to live in a world of d-bags, one starts by not being a d-bag themselves. To answer the OP in one word: Pragmatism.
I think both of them should be able to shoot their mouths off and say whatever the fvck they want.
Hook us up Euv-gotta!
You are so tiresomely boring... mostly because you seem to lack the ability to learn; this makes us go round and round in circles.
Neo Darwinism, modern synthesis of evolution believe its gene centric gradualism, solely natural selection at work producing diversity and common descent all life on earth. They ignore the evidence speciation isn't producing many splits and nodes, creating any 'new' species and novelty. They adhere to the modern synthesis even though many doubt gradualism is all that happened.