Ask Breitbart, I guess. He's never been any different.
Been watching all morning. I hate it.
Why should one outweigh the other in compelling me to behave? They could both be imaginary?
That's great to hear.
i would really like to believe that, but those who came forward after the fact, are very rich!!!
Be aware, very aware of this plant.
Never mind, this appears to be over your head.
There are a minority of Christians who do run these sorts of organizations and the work they do is invaluable and commendable. But the remainder are callous and hardened to the difficulties of modern society for many .
I notice you left out Russia, Comrade.
How did they cover it up? I see here a request from Capitol Police for a server, and then a Congressman telling him "hey, they want your server"
These "frustrated confused zealots" are just the Babies struggling to know themselves. It is like that in any species.
If he's sleeping through class every day, he deserves to fail.
I'm not a fan of Kim but she and her family leveraged their celebrity to create an empire and that seems to make people mad, by itself. As if people don't think there isn't enough wealth in the world for them so lets get mad at Kim because she gives people exactly what they want and makes tons of money from it.
Life is not proof there is a God, if so he is terrible at it.
inner marriage accusations about anything are suspect. ever been through a divorce?
I think William chose exactly who he wanted. He knew Kate for years - but had the choice of plenty. They are a great match and - it seems - a very happy couple : )
It is the body of Yeshua's business to denounce this type of conduct.
SoS. TY for pointing out my error. I think that a child of average intellect would have figured that one out. I guess you have an vested interest in pointing out the flaws of others as you avoid dealing with your own profound issues.
I mean your friends strategy was a numbers game
If either one had a brain it would be lonely ....
Lol excuse me, I was out living my life like it's golden and missed a few keynotes.
Again you miss the point. The fact that the Prison population is more Christian then anything and atheists make up less then 1% of the population, you have zero argument here.
When I was rich (LOL in money, not love) the cake was delivered and set up. But we cut it ourselves after photos and dinner.
Do you have a comprehension problem?
Earlier, yes. Damn Disqus.
P.S. Perhaps I don't really understand the definition of "strawman", or we have different definitions. What about my post is a strawman? How does it differ from the position of most Christian churches?
Yet here you are still, caring enough to go back in forth in a discussion.
Facts please . you numbers are impressive, but numbers only.
what did you say?
The only reason I haven?t told you to your face is because I haven?t met you.
Okay, so bottom line here...did the SC overturn the decision? The answer is yes. As such, he should be able to sue for losses and damages. He has been cleared of all wrong doing by the highest court in the land, has he not? Or did I miss the part where the SC ordered it back to the HRT and asked them not to consider his religious beliefs in such a negative light? Seeing as that was the crux of the matter, his religious beliefs, it would be hard to prove he wasn't being asked to surrender his religious principles in order to satisfy someone else's principles. That, it would seem, sets a pecking order for human rights, and that's a pretty slippery slope. What if a brown man accuses a black woman of something? Does brown trump black? Or does woman trump man? Do religious rights trump someone else's right to have a wedding cake made at a specific shop, when there are literally hundreds of other options for them?