Thank you, how are you doing?
You don?t subscribe to Mormonism because you do not believe Joseph Smith to be a spokesperson for God. You do not subscribe to Islam because you do not believe Mohammed to be a spokesperson for God. Yes there are millions of Mormons and there are 2 billion Muslims, but is that even a good reason to believe that those two men are spokesperson for God? Nope.
Ideas have consequences. Jesus says they aren't His followers. Who are you to disagree with Him about who is or is not His follower?
Is it that shocking?
Beware of surprise shrinkage.
The oppression is not so much from women themselves-it still hapowns though- but by the lying system. Feminising workplace? It's just one way. Those bitches are after good paying jobs without effort. I'll take them seriously when they'll fight to feminise mining jobs - other than figurative gold diggers, of course-.
You're making all these claims about this god of yours which you have yet to prove exists.
You certainly live in the past! I knew that the lefties were desperate, but I didn't realize that they were recruiting museum attendants as useful idiots!
No, I take historical ignorance seriously.
How is he a putz?
Yes because 'witches' were seen as a menace in the King James era so it seemed reasonable to edit the translation to support killing them. 'Witches' was a fairly modern concept not known at the time of the original writing.
Repeating what talking points? Im not arguing about the outcome of the cases presented against Jack Phillips IN THE PAST. There is no doubt he broke the laws and did not win those other others. You need to understand that I am specifically talking about the SCOTUS case. The arguments of this case has now shifted and are addressing compelled speech. The arguments in favor of Jack Phillips and against Jack Phillips are based on the first amendment. I posted a video of the audio pertaining to the SCOTUS case.
That's actually a very good premise for a discussion illustrating the differing qualities of faith and science. You're quite right of course, but the fundamental differences in their approaches to knowledge yield vastly different results.
There are these things called "libraries," unless the conservatives have defunded them all by now.
Islam? A tree will be known by its' fruit.
That's why you addressed what I wrote. You simply don't understand how evidence works.
And if Hillary would have been elected, Comey would have been fired. What's your point again? Comey's firing was not originating from Trump, it came from one of their internal affairs departments.
With my 1st marriage, we'd been together since we were 13. A couple for half my life. It was a foregone conclusion and we'd discussed getting married, but we also had some goals like getting out of grad school, jobs, etc... Only the timing of his proposal was a surprise. I guess also the fact that he had talked to my dad and gotten the ring without me knowing too.
Yeah. Those people definitely exist.
Well, there was the time I took a Unisom and ended up staying awake for 2 days, does that count?
That's funny - Romer v. Evans was back in 1996. Yes, over 2 decades ago at this point. How many polygamous marriages have became valid since then?
Big deal, Harper got his majority with 39.62%.
You didn't answer my question.
DSF. Does generally being brain dead count?
Perhaps, but that particular argument is a serious rabbit hole. I was pointing out the complete lack of planning and foresight in nature rather than arguing from imperfect design per se.
"The returns usually are decent..."
Funny how come God talked to you, why did he never talk to me, or any other atheists?
Ohhhhh!, a modicum of wit from the idiot!
I have traveled halfway round the world and have lived in Chester Hill NSW Australia. You are most likely a weak academician, steeped in self-hate and jealous of more capable men....Never dug a ditch in my life, but if I need to, I won't shrink from the chore. I even grow most of my vegetables to this day. Bet you couldn't keep up with me in any endeavor on your own, not manly enough....
When did GOD YHWH say this?
I would submit that an absence of evidence is generally, evidence of absence. Can you tell me one time in history when a lack of evidence pointed to the contrary?