There was no assumption, I quoted it directly. I even italicized it so it was easy to see and realize that those are your words.
So the standard is that YOU have to meet them. Glad that the standard for a group to have awful views has been established.
You know you have a serious problem if you say that and she says "Oh goodie!!"
Where is the evidence that Fields was being attacked?
The common understanding of the definition of faith does not specify the object of faith.
I would not support abortion even if there was a test for atheism, or worse liberalism
You article does show how European nations are failing and now you are deflecting with personal attacks. You?re not going to last long here.
I really don't get the "you must reject god to accept evolution" mindset people like Ken Ham and Rev have.
You only think you exist. You want objective proof that God exists now give objective prof that you exist. I can prove you DON'T exist with 4th grade science.
"Should beejers... be sacrificed for a saintly woman"
It also raised us up above the animals. We should be proud of taking that fruit.
Because you know for a certainty they are "sleeping"? You know for a certainty this student isn't insulin-dependent? You know for a certainty this student doesn't have a seizure disorder?
Careful, he "makes multiples of Texan".
Damn! Water's good for cotton mouth. She should have just bought some and cranked up Dark Side Of the Moon.
True. And I'm not sure why ABC would expect anything different from Rosanne. I wonder if there was any discussion of the pitfalls of twittering while stupid in her contract negotiations?
many times atheists are criticized for being too tough on believers. Here, you issue a 99 on believability of a god but you did it in such a way, it was like "Clearly, I believe strongly, what other people say don't matter and I'm not judging anyone else, either"