So, do you interpret the passage I provided from 2 Jude, differently?
Which theory describes physics?
He can ban all he wants.
I love when you get all feisty lol
Agree. Also, as I said deep in some thread below, it?s just not believable that the early Christians made up the person of Jesus. For one thing, why would they have him be humiliated and killed? That part of the story was a stumbling block to the people that early Christians were trying to convince that Jesus was the messiah and whatnot. Bart Ehrman calls this the criterion of dissimilarity?basically that a part of a story is more likely to be true if it goes against the agenda of the author. There are other examples, like Jesus being baptized by John the Baptist.
He wants to eliminate him out of Cleveland
Ever heard of neutral ... unbiased historians? Anyway, the truth is slowly making its way into the public ...
To late they are doing it already.
Did Kanye say anything about slavery?
So you're only dangerous on Wednesdays?
They are not child molesters.
Well it's closer to 7 really, but I'm not one to quibble... lolol
Both sides lose. Drives inflation and job losses.
Misogyny and racism usually go hand in hand lol
Actually, I have never heard that science supports Atheism. I don't think it does, but that doesn't mean it supports Theism. I find that Theists in an attempt to discredit Atheism, use strawman arguments about evolution and the big bang theory, which science does support. I think that is the confusion.
that is one vote... heh 2 more and it is a go.
Thanks for the resource. I have read it before.
It's gettin' all Friday up in here.
You are correct there are idiots on both sides none of which can take the time to make sure there are sending their message to the correct location. The majority of Americans are in the middle not on the right or the left.
It's because there's a myth that's somewhat prevalent in society that you can't be both - that you can't be both virtuous and sweet and innocent, and naughty/adventurous in the bedroom. Guys think they gotta choose, and mainstream media tends to emphasise that the former is a safer long-term investment, character-wise.
Wanna unpack that for us?
I just ask a question.
Indeed. My point was the subject of the picture, not the goofy writing attached.
what movies are there this summer?
I had a boss who I found out later was a Scientologist. I started learning about it, and it explained so many bizarre things about her actions and attitudes.
No, I do not insist on the last word. Believe me, if you think I sound like an Afgan Mullah, then you have no idea what an afgan Mullah really sounds like at all.
Golden plates that only work when hidden in a hat and read through a crystal?
That is a possibility. I have thought it would be a great move right after this confirmation
Contrary to the headline, this ruling had little to do with the debate over "religious freedom" and discrimination. The original ruling included a comment from one of the commissioners that expressed animosity towards the baker's faith. The decision should have been made simply on what the law stated. If he had left his opinions out of it, the ruling could have been very different. But, to paraphrase SCOTUS, that is a ruling for another case.
Romney: Trump will be reelected in 2020
I have heard that was false. Where did you read that?
The word says to simply be still. I agree with that.
Did your car crash itself? Call now for your part of a $300 million settlement...
Whats the difference between calling people to action (to commit a felony) and stating what a deity would do?
Correct. I am glad you understand that if everything is explained by science, the sequence goes like this: