Yeah because comparing a passive damaging agent to a virus is actually valid....
A key part of the Jesus story though, is, as a character, he's decidedly not rich and powerful, nor preaching for nor to the rich and powerful.
I believe that what we now call the "internet" was actually called "Arpanet" until about 1984 or so. I will check.
Do tell. Mos. where were you stationed?
nothing. nothing at all ;)
Who says that any of it bothers me? I confront them head on. If not, why would I be here? As for me believing ridiculous things, lets just say I am an adult and I can choose to believe whatever I want.
The images. No words can convey what images can.
He does have a thing for it.
Well Moose...Its actually the opposite...I am more than proud ot be a Canadian but my leader embarrasses those of us who love this country with his juvenile thinking.
Is that possible? Asking for a tree.
Nittany Lion :)
I'm not aware of any 'creationist' argument that complexity is the evidence of intelligent design. Creationist arguments are typically based on literal interpretations of the Bible. And intelligent design arguments do not rely solely on complexity. In fact, complexity is only used to rule out chance as a likely explanation.
The so-called "safe spaces" in universities are also strictly illegal. Restricting the freedom of speech is absolutely unconstitutional. And the same-sex community is sweating attempting to impact other people's lives as much as they can. Like that couple provoking the baker.
Sippin' on coke and rum, sayin' so what I'm drunk...