That's what happens when massive Governments instill laws, regulation and policy according to their "base" instead of just leaving people alone and concentrate on what small "g" government was instilled for in the first place. But no, instead we have tyranny masked as democracy...
No need for an apology, I'm not upset. I'm not the one making asinine claims about something I know nothing about then getting all huffy when challenged on it.
A "stroke"? Over dramatic much?
And most importantly:
#3 that?s not what she said
You claim to just be criticizing Islam for its own good, but in fact you believe it is folly, even damaging to people, and would like to see it disappear from the face of the earth. And you think Muslim folks should be responsive to you?" Why?
My want-to, vs. need.?
unless she or i agree'd, it didn't happen!!!
Make it so!
These aren't skeptics. They are deniers. And they purposefully choose to be ignorant about science.
Yet, you have provided zero evidence that consciousness can't evolve in 5 minutes, let along 20 - 30 million years...
Interesting. I completely misunderstood you. I had no idea that you would consider the terms 'man' and 'woman' to apply to the sociological and psychological perspective. I thought that the debate would be over the terms 'male' and 'female'. My mistake. I guess I still have a lot to learn about what it means to be intersex (if that is the right term to cover LGBTQ). Ok, so I need to do a quick mental adjustment. 'man' and 'woman' are used for gender identification. 'male' and 'female' are used for biology and physiology. I will try to adjust to that.
You're a nut.
Translation is very important. The original Greek word ecclesia was wrongly translated to Latin as Church. That created the misconception that the RCC represents Christianity.
If evolution proves God is not necessary, then Evolution does in fact have something to do with God's existence. And there are scores of quotes from ex-theists that say it was their faith in evolution that caused their atheism
"No, God communicated Himself using words that exist and have explicit meaning only in Him, through Him, and relative to Him."
ERMAGHERD!!!! I've decided I'm spending my Friday night drinking Tequila rose and watching baby goat videos
The rule should not need any interpretation. None of the Bible and what is in it needs it either, it is Gods word directly or inspired so it is written as it was needed to be read and understood.
The Supreme Court removed complementarity as a criterion for "marriage" under federal law, apparently imposing that same removal on the states.
You don't remember that same argument against serving black people during the civil rights movement?
>>"How has science shown that God doesn't exist? "<<
I don't see anything about dingos specifically on that link. In context, it seems to be about the dogs we keep as pets. See
And how are you this wonderful last day of May?
Lol, that's some dedicated lacing involved! The only thing is I don"t like platforms on me, it's too much added height. But nice, Hilrunner.
He's the one they are laughing at.
He doesn?t care if he hurts you. What else do you need to know?
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
I can understand women wanting women only classes. Maybe they are self conscious and feel that men are too judging. I don't think a men's only class is necessary.
Replacing one religion for another is not the answer. Replacing religion with reason and skepticism is better. I'd rather see religion being displaced by rational secular morals.
Or not caught, but bought at the local fishmongers'
oh my. Good thing she aint president.
Ah so you are not Irish and still tell a Irish person to stop working for change in Ireland. How interesting.