It never works :( You can bring them home but if they don't want to be there, they'll find a way to leave again.
Image deez nutz
Which gays and lesbians subscribe to extreme Muslim views and are throwing straight people off rooftops?
What, are you saying that the degrees in Cracker Jack boxes aren't good? Oh crap, don't tell my employer! :)
So send your kid to the 65 million school. Though I bet you're a lot less likely to face a shooter in the third day school.
Wild animals don't have a "culture"
I second your thoughts but simultaneously question how mama stores her gun. Was it stored properly? Was it loaded? Was it in her purse or on her hip? How did she respond so quickly?
Hmm... I'm not sure whether to say "yes I agree" or "no, it does not." to your last claim.
1) wiki is never a source to cite.
If you make a big claim, the burden of proof is on you, not me, to locate said evidence. Bring it forth and then we can talk about it.
If we had the proper respect for the President of the United States, we wouldn't question his understanding of the history of the United States. He is the President, he should be able to say what American history is. It's disrespectful to say he's wrong.
This. I just left the AME church after 38 years of belonging, because the preachers at both local churches made it a point to frequently spew divisive drivel from their pulpits... Telling people not to talk to other people on the basis of race or economic prosperity... Not something I felt comfortable with given I have a biracial family... It blows my mind some of the tripe that "preachers" spew in the name of Christ.
My niece and nephew don't shut the door when they use the bathroom either. Lol!
So mercy is immoral...
And I vote for keeping people like you and those who you defend off the welfare rolls---any sort of welfare rolls,
The person who rejects the unproven claim has done so by making his own counter-claim. If a claim must be rejected unless it is proven, why should we accept a counter-claim when it too is unproven?
Yes, I agree that religion does not belong in science. The question is whether some people's anti-religious bias may limit their scientific inquiries because they are prone to seeing things in a reductivist way, as a reaction against religion.
In my experience on these boards, people who are opposed to homosexuality often confuse it with being transgender. As such, it makes perfect sense to them that Paul both instructed against women wearing trousers and having short hair AND men sleeping with boys. Both are apiece. (Until you point out that Paul's talking about women wearing trousers, and men in skirts... they don't really have a problem with women wearing mens clothes, and don't like having it pointed out.)
There is zero protections outside of government in the constitution protecting people from the consequences of free speech. The players are free to exercise their free speech by kneeling but their employers are free to fire them.