I said nothing about morality I was talking about your god.
Who said that it relies on a logical fallacy? Imagine for a second if our court system operated that way. Conviction because somebody else broke the law a few thousand years ago.
You don't have one bit of evidence for that drivel. You sound like you have special powers unavailable to ordinary men.
Thankyou Loki....?? ??
No they can't. You started by assigning god's unseen qualities without evidence, then tried to find evidence to fit them. There is nothing that can be clearly seen that suggests a god.
With a plurality of world religions, it is not today a matter of whether God exists, but which God exists. christian, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, Bahai, Mormon, Hindu, and so on. How do you prove which God is the true God that exists. I am not sure I know all the answers to these questions, but I think I have learned the best answer for why the christian God is the true God.
Your marmite discussion was deemed by all mods to be counter to productive discussion. Had nothing to do with it not being religious, though we could see what it had to do with anything really.
Once more I have to ask: is posting the unhinged rantings of lunatics really Breaking News?
Bob Chiarelli tried to blame Harris for traffic deaths in Northern Ontario that occurred 10 years after he left office.
Ceaser burned some of it in 48 BC. But it was still around. Now, the history dept of osu states it was the Muslims who burned it in 640 AD. But from everything I remember in my study of this? It was burned right after the murder of philosopher and Pagan Hypatia of Alexandria as she was coming back from it.
Even IF all the owners did plot against him and IF he has some proof of this (and those are some big if's), he would have a snow balls chance in hell of winning because the NFL HAS a lot more money to spend on legal teams. like it or not that is a big factor.
I read studies that claim Lefties do think differently about some things. And there was a time during which it didn't take much to qualify for execution.
Yeah, but eliminating the story of the Fall (metaphorical or not) would require such a dramatic change that it might just destroy Christianity altogether.
"With an Athiest, it seems that the desire to break God's laws come first,"
Hey... every now and then I'm the fish. Today: I'm the gun-wielding barrel-owner!
None of what you run about matters. We do not go around asking others for money. If we live in excess, it is because of our own efforts.
We know you will believe whatever you want to believe even though it is false.
So it's true that you lefties prefer to have child traffickers and pedophiles attempt to cross the border illegally and use the kids as shields to avoid criminal prosecution. And I suppose the rent-a-mobs that the lefties pay for are suitably outraged that laws are actually being enforced since they don't respect the law anyway.
About utter nonsense.
If neuroscience holds true. Which it does of course.
Disagree with Tommy Robinson all you want. He's trying to save you.
I see nothing wrong with either definitions. So, what's the problem with faith and pilgrimage?
And any nimrod can get a Phd from Stanford
Responsible gun ownership would be supporting background checks. It would be supporting banning bump stocks. It would mean supporting regulations that actually prevent the mentally ill from obtaining weapons. It means not defending every far right terrorist who for example takes over a national wildlife refuge. It means actually being principally for responsible gun ownership.
Is that a good thing or a bad thing?
Yeah cause Tory's pretty special.
The Soviets were famous for altering pictures so the shamed would be deleted from their history. The Democrats have been doing much the same. Starting with statues that link their racist past to today, and trying to transfer blame to the Republicans.
Is one no longer 'useful' to the world if they feel they have nothing left to learn? I wouldn't want to have to argue that before a panel. However, I was speaking existentially not practically. The goal of knowledge is to come to the end of the quest for knowledge. The goal of the knowledge-seeker is satisfaction, peace of mind. Not usefulness.
I never did, lol. Same thing. I had as much sex as I wanted but that doesn't mean I didn't exercise control. Sex is not wrong but you still need to be smart
If jesus existed, and no one has shown that he did or didn't exist, we can be sure he was nothing at all like contemporary christianity would like to portray him.
Actually I'm not. You simply don't understand your own position. Why do you think there's 40,000 denominations of Christianity? None of you fully agree on what it means to be a Christian. If you identify as a Christian you're a Christian. Simple as that.
Well, their "summary" is their opinion, and explicitly contradicts the research.