No, it really is an ambiguous concept and unless folks define exactly what they mean when they use that term, folks would misunderstand what the other is saying. Its not unlike the use of religious terms, like "God" or "spirit" or even that word "mind". To discuss those, first, requires the user of the term to explain what he or she means. So that folks are on the same page. Right?^
Wow! A Jim Jones devotee. Deep into the denial.
How's DoFo looking now folks?
If Hillary was elected? Probably right. The Russian collusion investigation would turn up some actual evidence in that case.
Also, I need to move :)
No one knows how the universe came into existence, least of all people who are biblical literalists.
way?yo?w?res is singular?
Because you're a chump for others. Sure, the blind lady gets across the street: and now you're 15 minutes late for where you needed to be!
No, dickless fag, i mean an actual woman, not like your hairy back "husband".
Not real people, they were pagans. Doesn't count what they think happened.
I voted PC.
"F*ck!!! This guy's using facts?! Sh*t!! Dammit!!! I cannot wait until the internet purges us of people like this!!!" - belittle
I can help.
it is proven to me, as it is to all them who have believed ... I am not alone..God has chosen us!!! while you are planted in darkness regarding the truth ,the way, and the life.. Jesus Christ... Aye abound in the knowledge of his resurrection... you wait me time , because I will only tell you the same thing over and over again...which reminds me of a joke me uncle used to tell me...tell the jew once, the wite man twice and the other feller til he understands!!! looks like you just like that
Yeah, who knows. Those eastern ideologies/philosophies/religions, what I know of them, I find very attractive.
How is that different than "the reader will interpret it according to his or her ignorance and preferences," except for adding in the middle man of course?
You just aren't up to understanding it. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
No, what is irrelevant is your comment.
It seems to be platform wide.
I didn't answer Uncle Screwtape for a very good reason.
?We don?t know exactly how life came to be. Therefore, god,?
Not really, we can make assumptions based upon the interaction of the radiation with the detector, so after applying the right correction factors, you're really measuring the amount of ionizing radiation at the detector. But with radiation. . .like most things. . .there is no competing vector. A columnated gamma beam coming in from the left doesn't affect the general field source you're measuring. You just end up with a higher reading in the spot where they intersect. Radioactivity and radiation are two very different things, by the way.
I have, seems like you have Texas IQ.