What does it mean?
I never thought that hair colouring and abortion were alternatives.
Even the most subjective moralist believes that some things are objectively wrong (i.e. wrong for everyone, not just himself).
But... didn't you just say,
After spending my whole career looking at other people's financial transactions I can assure you they hold no interest to me now
How is it out of context? It is clear. God can't stop iron chariots.
Except create and sustain an entire universe and all life within
Islam doesn't pose a threat to the west. If you think it does, Christianity is not the way to defend the west.
Yes! I do.
says you, not everyone. Therefore, not objective morality
We need an irrational belief system (Christianity) to fend off an irrational belief system (Islam)? Fight fire with fire? Christianity has been tamed over time thanks to secular law and exposure to science knowledge. Islam is where Christianity used to be during the crusades and Inquisitions. That's scary to be sure. But you can't enlist people to become Christians as you would enlist people to become soldiers. So whatever illegal acts are committed by Moslems they must be met with secular law, not Christian sensibilities.
Interesting comment. And yet, those employers don't get fined or jailed do they.
I think it is shorthand for the process and findings of scientific methods do not rely on belief.
Madam Blavatsky was a charlatan and a cult leader, not a peer-reviewed scholar. For some legit info on Mithraism, I would recommend "The Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism" by Franz Cumont, which you can find here:
Dude, it's a boombox. Now you patch into her WiFi and stream it on her in home speakers.
A good majority, yes. I've paid for a few abortions. That was the main concern for them. I can even tell you the exact words. I can not afford a child now.
What does this soap opera have to do with whatever religion?
We all have our Hobbies ??
I can get you a good price on some bullet proof "gun free zone" signs
No I fvcking can't lol
No, they deliberately set up a government without any religion. In fact, James Madison wanted it spelled out directly but that got voted down, so what we have is a compromise of just not having God mentioned at all and the first phrase in the First Amendment.
She is in it for the benefit of herself, the party and Liberal friends, and like all good (read "horrid") progressives, she doesn't care how much those benefits cost taxpayers, so long as the money keeps flowing.
You'll notice that those occurred in places where wearing the Burqa was either routine or mandated, and a couple are duplicates of the same story from different sources. Right now you're more likely to get killed in a traffic accident or get mowed down by someone in a public school building, which is a sad fact.