Deepak is that you?
I read ?stumped? as humped at first. Changed the entire context of your post.
"Christian mythology"? "Muslim mythology"?
Plenty of people struggle to stay alive each day. Spade was no different.
To me, a multimillion dollar megachurch with a seven figure a year salary Reverend in a city with homeless people should ask themselves what would their messiah do and maybe stop making houses of worship their market.
That is different.
Yes mental illness runs in families
She didn't melt. :(
Yup. I don't think he needs any bias training, neither.
I don?t know that there isn?t a prime mover.
Typo: phonetic Latin it's Iesu, or Iesus. Not with two 'u's.
So you think that all the ignorant philosophies are Christian? Wow.
What is biased in this account of Muhammad's lifestory?
I know it's crazy good
Really. Not what Einstein and Newton thought, and a host of others who regularly wondered where their creative ideas and stream of consciousness was coming from.
"Care to explain how it would be determined that it was the Hebrew "God," as opposed to mere mortals, who killed a couple hundred thousand folks in one night?"
There is a question of semantics here, because the answer depends what exactly is meant by "write." The consensus of Muslim historians is that Muhammad dictated the Quran and his followers wrote down what he dictated. This would not be "writing" in the narrowest sense of the word, but it would make Muhammad the author. In the absence of a plausible competing theory of authorship, there's no reason to reject this claim.
That's another downfall a child falls into state custody, they get to make the rules, no matter how stupid they are.
Why does Iran want the bomb? It's quite a thing to be proposing courses of action, especially war, without addressing the reason they want the bomb in the first place.
Then what would it want to pass?
Possibly it is. What is your point?
It is naive to think i am a Republican...
No errors. You haven?t made any claims so there are no errors to be made. I just took your continuous lack of any substantive response as a sign of a lack of knowledge on the subject.