So far, out of all the responses, yours is actually the closest to what is actually happening. The Department of Education is negotiating with the RCC to divest itself of hundreds of schools, either turning them over to the state OR to multi-denominational organisations like Educate Together.
Any sex that isn't under marriage is sin in the bible. And the bible clearly defines marriage between a man and a woman. Christ did this himself. You're not very well learned, at best.
That?s called channel bashing. Don?t bite the hand that feeds you.
That is how the story plays out, but I just don't see anything remotely credible in the Gospel narrative.
Sir tainley says:
Roofing "supplys?" Good grief, the man can't spell but he sure knows the bible.
Why yes, I do. Both sides are obligated to adhere to and demonstrate the adherence to reason in order to established reasoned communication. If one side refuses to do so, its argument is not reasoned by definition. I'm sure you can see how this works.
Ok, if it's just a modicum, then go ahead and post the model # of your keyboard and then find out who designed it.
Actually God could not create itself as Divine Beings. Because everything God creates is creation and not Him.
Yes. They do all the time.
Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you!
No, you would go to jail. God's too big to go to jail. It couldn't hold him.
What do I care who feeds the poor? Of course Christian food banks make people sit through a sermon before you feed them, whereas secular food banks just help. so it's a bit annoying that even feeding the masses you're always selling.
If I believe in the Divine authority of a Leprachaun the burden is on me to prove it's existence and the evidence should scale with such an extraordinary claim.
No, he's 1% certain there is one.
Thanks, you are so compliant. Yet another stupid and bigoted comment from you. I can?t wait for your next.
Morality is a myth.
one....did you see more
You raise a good point, but I think it still makes more sense that the primary meaning would apply to this situation. It's critical that the conception of Jesus in Mary was by the Holy Spirit and not by man, as otherwise the sin-nature would be passed down to Him and He would no longer be able be a fitting sacrifice for the sin of the world.
Free and civil societies have all kinds of restrictions that are cultural and arbitrary. If you are against our culture being offended and banning the burka for cultural reasons then are you in favour of striking down all other culturally based laws? Including public nudity? Or is it that as a member of this culture that public nudity is icky and so would uphold the ban? Well I find public disguises icky and grossly offensive. .
No...all rituals are completely obsolete as Christ..the real deal came and should have bee that final real sacrifice. Everything up to then, concerning ritual was rehearsal.
You're not supposed to figure that out.
No, we do think of the question. We just get a different answer than you.
P.S. I used to work at our library so the books with dewey decimal labels were not stolen but purchased for like fifty-cents. Library perk! :)
I have seen shades of that here. I had a talk with my college bound female aides. (They're all female this year except for my one male student who is entering the service.) I've tried to teach them about these guys, and what they might face in college or the workplace.
Haven't you heard? The claimant has the burden of proof. Haven't you heard, claims are not synonymous with proof. Nothing to do with similar experiences, dishonest one.
Didn't the Brits vote awhile back to keep the royals rather than dumping them?
Every news article you have ever posted barely even mentions the issues you seem to have a problem with.