your history is so skewed and wrong. Southern conservatives were kicking people out of restaurants. Democrats adopted the civil rights act in the early 60's.
"Are we making this argument in present time, or centuries ago? Because back then, idiot white people were convinced that black people were literally an inferior species of people. Science tells us that their genetic makeup is identical. I don't believe there are many people left in society that honestly believe the bible tells them whites are better than blacks."
Yes, and common sense tells us that if there is a wedding for dogs, it is just for fun.
Thanks for weighing in on the topic
No I mean, how to navigate the field of law. How to learn what the correct answer is before you go to court and how to defend yourself in court.
Black culture is simply the result of their genetics. Low IQ, with an aggressive disposition.
oh its not just that - it has been going on since Nov 2017
At some point you would think you have to yield to the facts. But I see you are without the power to control yourself. I'll pray for you my friend.
What two people do, consensually, in their own car (or their own home, hotel room etc) is a matter entirely between them. UK law is not stating that if someone looks in your kitchen window, and sees something they *disagree* with, that they can bring a case against you. However it would be an entirely different matter if you went into their front garden, or stood in front of their desk at work, and thus *forced" yourself (and whatever you were doing) upon them. It's in the latter case that you would be guilty of deliberate harassment.
It's sad to read you're on the wrong side of history with that one
<sarcasm> Starving to death sounds good. Children getting raped sounds 'blessed.' It sure is a blessing when genocide happens. </sarcasm>
How dare a certain individual not support the party trying to deny them rights!
Those sounds like political differences, rather than outright religious differences.
I'm an absolute agnostic, if that matters.
Look What up? I gave you an example of a real case. You claim it's not possible. What is there to look up?
There will never be such a test. Genes don't cause behavior or make personality something predictable and foregone. The most a genetic test could ever do would be to indicate a higher or lower statistical probability of a child having a particular set of sexual desires. Human personality is the result of the interaction of genes with their environments.
Minors are incapable of consenting to sexual activity.
Great. You can take my word for it, or you can wait till I dig up the source, but Reliance of the Traveller says that Islam's obligatory charity tax, zakat, can be spent on Muslims only, but not on Kafirs. And that's the main problem with Islamic ethics: it prescribes different treatment to Muslims and non-Muslims. OK, it is not prohibited to help a Kafir who is not at war with Islam, but zakat is for Muslims only.
it's a t word..... lol.....
How would YOU describe them?
I support the right of people to believe whatever ridiculous things they wish as long as those beliefs do not involve negative impacts to innocent others.
This is really a state issue. The federal government doesn't have that authority.
Most do not believe this went down this way.