If Nympha, Lydia, Chloe and others mentioned were leading or helping lead home churches, and these were mentioned in letters to those areas, there probably were others too in other areas that we just didn't have mention of.
If he's sleeping through class every day, he deserves to fail.
Uh huh - pure fabrication. If there is anything about DoD in your posts it cause you added it by edit after to play a juvenile trick and pretend to be smart. I thought you were an emotional hate driven clown but it appears your an emotional hate driven trickster. Too funny.
Projection? Nah, plenty of daily examples of exactly that by the left. And not just fringe nobodies. The speakers for the left. The leaders of the left. The media of the left.
What kinds of reasons count as nefarious? Is nefarious a value judgment of some kind?
Yeah, but when she can't breath and the nebulizer treatment isn't helping. she doesn't take it constantly, only when she needs to open up her airways.
Do you suggest God's decision was mindless?
What's your case for Doug Ford is going to fix it... that relies on anything other than "Doug Ford is lying, and you shouldn't believe a word he says"?
"What could constitute substantial support from intuition or intellect more than a god sending himself to sacrifice himself to himself to save us from himself?"
"The Church established at Pentecost was the Apolstolic succession and Peter was the leader (first pope). So you celebrate the birth of the Catholic Church at Pentecost."
he should not have to ask. They should have told him. My Mother had a rule when you get your first job you start paying rent $20 a week. Every time you lost a job the rent went up 50%
"Ultimate Truth"! Now tell me what that may be.
Yes. In the past, people who gave charity knew that God was on the side of the MISTREATED poor and chastised those who were indolent.
I honestly don?t. I just know it?s something I could never do.
Look it up. No one this side is lying.
Well, personal stories are, by their very nature, subjective and thus open to a multitude of interpretations. While they're certainly comforting, they're not evidence.
I know you want to believe they are equal in the eyes of science, a battle between equal points of view, but your "sources" break every tenet of the scientific method. Trying to skew the facts to support your religion is the anti thesis of science, it's religious belief, nothing more.
Go read about the recent case of "an unnamed Honduran man" who claimed he was told he would get his daughter back if he voluntarily self-deported. Go read the article, it cites the man himself and two immigration lawyers, but doesn't name any of them or give any identifying details of any kind. Yet, the media in a suspiciously-looking-coordinated attack, all jumped on it at the same time.
Socialism never works.
Why would he object?
Nope archeology says otherwise.
That you can't disprove?