so,, from a guy perspective..
Well, no wonder... you can't actually associate them with their heroes out loud like that. Shame on you, you should know better! That's like showing Hillary a picture of her kissing Robert Byrd and then telling her she's kissing a Klan Grand Wizard!
There are only 2 logically possible options:
He didn't refuse service to them. He offered to sell them anything in the store - save a wedding cake.
OK Louie, here....
That is why it is Godly Wisdom. Always works out as planned.
It can be a choice, but it's often not. Depending on the situation, she might not be able to make enough to even pay for childcare and gas back and forth if she worked.
They are not getting them because they are religious. Gamekeepers get cottages, tenant farmers get cottages, etc. By that yardstick, should priests also be allowed a 'housing allowance' as part of the fulfillment of their duties?
Tell that to Christian scholars, not me. They say he was referring to himself as being a king. But why this is strange for you while Jesus admits he is a children killer?
Is she a porn star?
I agree that they are all flawed in some of their thinking. But we aren't talking about anyone other than Trump. If I thought that he even cared about anything but himself, I would be able to give him credit but so far he hasn't shown that. I can give him credit for getting the three prisoners out of North Korea. That's about as far as I can go. Other than that, he hasn't done anything positive for the country.
LSD is wonderful! At least it used to be. The divine 'glow' I speak of is a recognition of 'that which you are' being in and of everything. Everything is THAT. You are THAT. There is only THAT. God is a common word for it but the God concept gets dressed up in all sorts of regalia which is an invention of the mind. That which you are isn't an invention of the mind. It is the seer of the mind. It exists in a different order of reality, a different dimension. That 'dimension' is you minus the movement of thought.
You haven't given me a definition or an example, and you just changed your claim quite a bit. Before you had been arguing that the gospels' prose and structure mirrored that of works of fiction that were recognized as such. Now you're saying (still without example) that they were written "in the prose and structure of theology" - whatever that means.
Its racist to even imply their "economic problem" is a result of not living with white people. Their problem has nothing to do with geographic location, it has to do with the way their population acts in society.