Kelly. If rewards like bribes and affection are offered for good, obedient and righteous beliefs and punishment and pain is promised for noncompliant, nonconformist or individualistic beliefs then that is not ? unconditional? love.
I wouldn't say that this passage makes me uncomfortable, but I wouldn't choose it as an ethical guideline:
The point is you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. I would have thought that was clear, even to you.
We personally invite people who don?t want invites. It is known .
But just to be clear - I'm agreeing with your conclusions, but not your logic. And I strongly suspect you're being coy, as you know this logic is used by others to justify an atheist viewpoint.
As per you, nothing matters since we die anyway. Yet 3 suppositories is somehow my logic?
Bacchus. I do not know what those verses mean. As I read it:
No, they don't.
Ikr? Get in, get it done, sit down with my cup of java and enjoy the clean!
SoS. Throw your excrement in your hand into the toilet like a big boy.
No, they do not. It's bad for business to have a player kneeling for the national anthem when so many people find that distasteful and disrespectful.
You know you've made god in your image when your god hates the same people you do
"People, in general, strive to be good, regardless of their beliefs"
You're still trying to convince me, though. You don't have to.
If you can't control what's INSIDE, how do you want to control what's OUTSIDE?
I am really trying to figure out what objection is to
It is the word of God, there is no need to add 'infallible'.
Admiring da Vinci,I used to wonder if instead of a rarely occurring outlier,what the results would have been if the prevalence of da Vincis had been increased by a factor of 10,20 or whatever within a given previous span of time.Would the results have culminated in the world as an armed nuclear camp awaiting its Armageddon/Strangelove moment in the 17th century?
What else do they need? There's positive proof that love exists.
Those are imaginary. If the y were real, they'd be mentioned in the bible.
Its a subject with lack of human power nor ability to fix, just like every other problem facing humankind. No wonder the sarcasm. Maybe it's realism shining through.
Lol I bet
Your eye is misdirected. It"s about the forum. Believers have forums where values, empathies, and purposes are inspired and assimilated that can tend to sustain a decent civilization. Atheists have dope houses, porn parlors, child trafficking and grooming centers, and no assimilating sense of social responsibility whatsoever. Except, that is, to make a goat of Whitey, ridicule Christians, undermine families, and vote to put stooges for oligarchic despots in power so they can farm the speople while making phony balogny promises of free stuff and redistribution to fellow gangstas.
WOW!!! You are suggesting that I read a book written by 2 Edomite jews and expect to get the truth out of it??? You stand a better chance of getting Blood out of a Turnip. hahahahaha