You shot down nothing. Copernicus did not suffer for his supposed "crimes." Neither, really, did Galileo. But if it makes you feel good to believe that, by all means, go ahead.
This scenario is flawed for two reasons:
You are correct, because to me they ARE equivalent.
Other than all the blood and teenage female angst? Ha. :)
Everything is fine to me, family dramas, dumpster fires, off beat relationship stuff
Well, personal stories are, by their very nature, subjective and thus open to a multitude of interpretations. While they're certainly comforting, they're not evidence.
She's been dead the last 6 months... they just keeping spraying her with Fabreeze
The OP is there read it
That specific person represents an idea, a nation and entire ideologies and groups. So you can choose to trivialize and act like that's all it is about but that would just expose your willing ignorance.
so, you won't share your evidence?
Psychologists say changing orientation does great psychological harm to the person. So it can be changed. To what end? Make someone really messed up so you can feel a little bit more comfortable? Why not change your orientation toward them. Easier and that too will make you feel better with no cost to them?
2008. I was SO excited when Obama was elected.
I understand your train of thought. The world in that time will be celestial. 1000 years in Earths Solar system of counting is equal to 1 day in heaven. So the 1000 year reign is 1 day in Heaven. GOD tells us time and time again that we shall be led into "all truth" when the Son of Man comes. This reveals that "all truth" is not found the bible. Therefore, it is the Son of Man that shall make it plain, and he has. The 1000 year reign happens when the earth has transfigured. And only those that also transfigured will be there, including those that are resurrected in the first resurrection.
There?s a counter&western song that sums it all up: ?God is great, beer is good, people are crazy.? ??
Thank you for your thoughts, Susan???????
Why? What have you heard?
If all creation requires a creator, then who created the Christian god?
"I'm not the one that denies the threat of MS-13."
Comment was mostly a hyberbole/hyperbola joke relying on the fact that "hyperbolic" is the adjective for both. And now you say you don't know what a hyperbola is and apparently are too incurious to look it up yourself. Pity. You'd do well, I think, to read about the history of zero. It took a long while for zero the number (as opposed to zero the placeholder) to come about and there were philosophical objections to its creation. How can nothing be something? But if you're unwilling to look up a conic (or, heck, the whole set), I haven't high hopes. Alas. If you knew more math, you might give up this zero business, focus on "God of the gaps" with step functions. Watch for the floor/ceiling function scism, but don't worry, both sides can unite against an integralist who claims there's no difference. (Differentialist walks right by -- there's nothing to see.) :-)
Sorry, after reading your racist comments on your profile, I don't believe you. Good bye.
This is not denying service to people at a lunch counter. Please, he was willing to serve them the other items in the store.
Religions don't need gods. Just ask the Buddhists.
The God question actually doesn?t depend on Scientific proof, although the health and intelligence benefits of prayer are a good start, as is Psychosomatic healing. Any fantasy that Science is the be all and end all is called by its ideological name, Scientism.
Your distinction was that the God in the religion turned Human. Krishna turned human and so did Zeus.