No sarcasm, what do you mean by speak with their full voice on the net?
Both needed to be clarified. We're on internet, and not everybody lives in the U.S. or believes in Thor.
"this is excessively well covered."
You seemed like you had questions. If you hate being given answers to them, that's fine. I don't realise relevant answers only counted if were original research.
So I looked at the reviews on your historians who verified the myths of Judeo-Christian religions. These look like nice books about the history of the times, but none of the reviews indicates anything about proving myths. One would think THAT would be the lead, not completely ignored.
Great, many thanks for the assistance. You must have unlimited patience.
But they are not good tricks. I mean, the only way they can pull them off is with the audience to be part of the trick. if that's the case, then there is not trick. It's all just an act, with no real skill, just one big setup for the camera. Nothing special about that.
But your critique seems to be "We can't trust this written account, because it's based off an oral tradition" rather than a first hand account.
What you just said was that scientists believe "knowledge" can be had by means other than empiricism. I have repeatedly pointed out that knowledge of things can only be had by the senses, and you elide that difference here. I have also pointed out that the test is the empirical component. Maybe you should my comments again. Or your own.
don't use facebook or anything like that. Closest thing is Youtube and if my boss wants to know what videogame/movie reviews and music videos I watch then he has WAY too much free time.
I never saw god described as a failure before. An interesting take
"He is comparing DNA(natural/biological) to a computer program(man-made/material) they may have similar functions, but are not the same at all."
Oh wait remembered another...
Opt out of what? School?
Not wrong,no.You have been up and down this page, incorrectly stating legal issues. The US Constitution trumps whatever religion they have. If it does not, they are unfit to have that seat
In what way?
Well Turd Boy certainly isn't getting the job done so it's time to send in a man to do a man's job. Turdowe likely isn't welcome after he stabbed Trump in the back and they're likely aware of his Harvey Weinstein impersonation so have to protect Melania and Ivanka.
"Does it surprise you to learn the bible talks about flames in heaven?"
They were being nice by providing you with information. These things are of real interest if you care to actually discuss religion with any facts.
The problem is that there are people that live their life by that book and then pass their morality on me. So me not reading the book only means I am unprepared for such prejudice. If I know what those people believe I can keep myself from being unfairly treated.
In the spirit of our conversation on the other channel: Pop quiz, what Mid-east country recognizes same-sex marriages of its citizens as lawful? :-)
Not a logical riposte.
that would be a good choice too
If everything was already there, then it's not "in the beginning."
Who would have thought a business would react in a way that is best for their business.
How do you know there has been no answer?