The law already does. His religious freedom does not give him the right to discriminate against gay people.
I hope you realize that Christian was originally a derogatory term used in Asia Minor for disciples of Jesus.
Gonna be 82 down here! One of these days, I'm going to take a trip to NY.
And I logged out, and logged in again, and now it's set to private again! ??
Yes, the OP did.
For the people saying they are pro-life bc life is sacred.. does that extend to all life or just unborn humans?
I dunno, have you ever smashed a knitting engine? ;-)
Just hop on your private jet. I?ll tell my chauffeur to pick you up.
The money has been promised, not spent. And adding another $5B to it is all Ford's doing.
Apparently Jesus DID have to die on the cross because that's what happens in this world to people like him, people being what they are. That is MY take on the Jesus story.
This is about the federal government, remember? The 1st amendment, etc.
It has the Salvation Message in it.
Here is a sample quote from your researcher:
Again, your problem is with the democratic process, not Christians. If Christians are opposed to gay marriage, vote their consciences, and select politicians who support their views, how is that in any way wrong? Like I said, you only like democracy when your side wins. And we are not a secular Republic. There is no "separation of Church and State" in the Constitution, anywhere. You can search for that phrase high and low, and you'll never find it. The 1st Amendment was not designed to protect government from religion; it was designed to protect religion from government. Study European history, the Pilgrims, etc., and you'll understand.
"Speciation is fact, but evo isn't only mere speciation."
Now now your ladyship, you are selling yourself short
And, at least to an extent artificially induced by stimulating the brain.
You should make a thread just on this. You're right. When you feel better you do embrace the actual truth more often.
If you plan to block us mods, please let us know first.