Much worse! Beating a live horse?
Bigots should be exposed wherever they may be. Do you think that refusing service to a person is neighbourly?
I?d have to wear an eye patch, of course ...
Is that - 'digitally' - the 'only' way you think? Why are so limited? He is all. He is not eternal. He is eternity.
An authority, like a teacher or school administration, endorsing a religion is unconstitutional. Students are free to worship on their own. Teachers are not free to tell the students to worship. I'm sorry, but SCOTUS has more authority than you do.
Yeah, because those automatic ones are too slow. Plus I like the feel of puncturing a can.
If you say so.
I didn't say that the tendencies are absent, I said that they were able to effortlessly supress it and they can (I have no problem doing it). There are those who simply don't care enough to supress it but I have found them to be in the minority.
Saw McCaskill this morning
Refugees come in illegally all the time. Many asylum seekers even have to go through a ridiculous process which as a result is worse than if they had come in illegally. Nothing you're saying here is disproving what I said anyway. AGAIN: citing the law is meaningless. Current immigration law is a HUGE liberal govt program. It's the main focal point of the problem here. When you make things so restrictive, just like with most other things, it creates a black market. It's so ridiculously restrictive that I'm convinced corporations here lobby to do so on purpose. That way they can get the cheap labor without having to pay the govt it's cut.
What is done to the children if they refuse? I shudder to think what these fascists will do to them.
You can't provide a single example of the exact same conditions producing different outcomes. You can't cite a single mainstream, peer-reviewed scientist who presupposes an orderly universe or a single mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific source enunciating your "rules of the game. You can't relate these "rules of the game" to any aspect of the scientific method.
I'm arguing that the legislature has no business being involved in this.
I know. "A number" apparently literally means three...from at least 6 years ago? And he was pissed off at the military. So are a lot of people.
Ever feel a breeze blow past you and catch the smoke of a fire, that is the Wind and you just saw it. Just as your OP is BS so is your claim you've met God. John 1:18
Do not think about all the sweatty palms that have been on it before.
An atheist would be hedonist because life is limited, there is no justice, and pleasure is the greatest calling.
Secular argument (not "atheist") for morality is very simple and totally objective. Morality is a measurement of how much harm you inflict or help you give to other people. Moral judgement comes from the victims of the harm you cause. Causing harm is immoral. Not causing harm is ammoral (unless you enhance freedom for others by doing nothing) and helping others is moral. Harm is measureable and objective. How you feel about the harm is subjective but it doesn't matter how people feel about it. You just need to avoid causing objective harm.
"We all know" really means "Victor thinks", but thanks for playing. I'm not going to agree to your terms to debate my faith. My convictions are quite fine, thanks, and my "fold" is my congregation who mostly believe as I do. Sorry if that makes it harder for your simplistic facile attacks on believers. I'm not a Scotsman either.
I have seen this illusion plausibly explained. All illusion is and can be explained for whatever physical contraptions are used to portray the hoax. This is not so with magic. Magic is paranormal; illusory is not. The error many people make in their understanding about them is that they think the two are one in the same thing, but they aren?t. They are a world apart from one another.
False. God is not required to give you anything. Not even free will.
Churches are businesses. They take in money, sometimes quite a bit. They sell bullshit, but people buy it.
I don't blame you, Zac. You will never measure up and it will only piss you off even more.
Circumcism is genital mutilation imposed on a helpless child.
Do you consider personal feelings to be associated with reason?
But without, there would have likely been no results. Some better than none?