It doesn't sound like she works. It's difficult for her to understand work if she's home alone all day not working. She's also probably more frustrated with unfinished projects since she's home more than you. But if she can't offer solutions she shouldn't point out problems you're already aware of. Does she expect you to continue to take care of her after the divorce? You can't afford to lose all the household income to make her happy. And you can't let her guilt you into making bad decisions. If she's going to give you an ultimatum go ahead and get the divorce.
Seriously, most rap now is about something social issues or partying. Gangsta rap is pretty niche now.
How does mythical religious dogma advance this conversation?
Finding a major flaw in evolutionary theory would make the career of any scientist. All you need is evidence.
You tell him!!
Oh.. NOW you want to stick to the topic. That's bloody rich. You pivot more than a compass, but suddenly you want to stick to the topic (even though you made the claim about the decline of Christianity in your OP, so it's fair game).
Are you honestly claiming that the support for abstinence-only education and crisis pregnancy centers is not almost entirely based on religious beliefs? They don't even try to hide it. Conservative politicians proudly quote scripture as they enforce these backward policies. Crisis pregnancy centers often call themselves things like "prayers for life."
Wrong thread, lol
It is embarrassing to see people saying unborn children are not human beings.
Which the Queen can just C-Block your decisions.
I expect so. I hate DWS so let's get her outta here.
I love that movie and Bruce Willis
Why yes, I do. Both sides are obligated to adhere to and demonstrate the adherence to reason in order to established reasoned communication. If one side refuses to do so, its argument is not reasoned by definition. I'm sure you can see how this works.
There is no such thing my tard friend.......down that path lies Venezuela ......(why can't libtards learn this?)
Invoking the WBNA helps. ;-)
Lol ok now use it in a sentence
so who will you be voting for?
That is a pretty thick blanket statement. There are Christian denominations that teach from the bible, while emphasizing that the Mosaic Law (that part about punishment for homosexual activity) is part of the old and no longer valid law for ancient Israel. Those that stress the importance of "doing unto others as you would have them do unto you" and so on. Just because some in a group are unacceptable isn't a valid nor a logical reason to demonize the entire group.
Question? Did the people do what was right?
Ahhh, but above you indicated that you support frumpf and called your reason for doing so your "religious pov"...
No way, his was a harder Nut to crack than mine. ?? ?? ??
Take the internet from you and you would be completely useless.
the Bible's "universe" was immensely smaller than the real universe, which makes sense because back then massive things like stars, were just dots stuck to a dome. We know better now.
Can I use it? I know someone I want to shit on.
So you are saying that it's OK for your god to do what he tells us not to do? The children are dead, right? God did it. What he did is considered murder. I don't think that you can parse the definition to include only people. Don't forget, the definition as a legality only needs to include humans because mythical characters don't count for anything in our courts.
Why do you suppose born and bred Americans are so much more violent than illegal immigrants?
If Trump has to testify under oath, he's automatically screwed, because he's a natural born liar. Even his lawyers acknowledge this.
They're both kids