Not a problem. Always good to see a good point well argued.
For a country with no resources, they sure can launch missiles and perform airstrikes often. Almost like they have a powerful military backer...
Ty Yvonne! In my case weight and self esteem were so closely tied together it was hard to process that gaining weight does not make me less than in any way.
Yep. Looks nice. But the Reality is better.
I hate to break the news to you but you are a product of the Protestant reformation just like the rest of the heretics. Martin Luther changed Sacred Scripture and added the word ?alone? to Romans 3:23 in order to create the ?Bible alone??theory. The fruit of the Spirit of the Reformation is evident through the 40,000 denominations... I guess with you as a rogue sheep among them, your own dogma adds to the pile of heresies making it 40,001. But actually it?s unknown how many Protestant sects there are, which is sayin? something about the fruit, eh. Everything you hate, really hate, about religion is embodied by the faiths that have risen as institutional Christianity?s decline... prosperity preachers, Joel Osteen, self-help guru, and so on... A bunch of scattered sheep in your disdain for ?organized?. The Truth is, Truth is also an organized Good Shepherd, so your whole ?spiritual but not religious? is not knowing Him. And out how curiosity, how do you reveive Him as the Bread of Life? The Gospel alone has taught you nothing if you do not understand how to interpret it. You have no authority and #thingsJesusneversaid was to make true whatever you want to be true. Relativism is the product of the reformation. You read a nice a verse about Jesus dying for our sins and now you?are saved regardless of your sins.. alleluia! In your cherry-picked version of the Gospel is a half truth, which also makes it a half lie. If you truely want to be saved, enter through the Gate (Jesus) and follow the narrow path to Salvation. Here are a few verses to get you started on getting to know your Savior:
Let's see now; of all of the sexual intercourse that took place today between men and women all around the world, I wonder what percentage was undertaken for "the sole purpose of creating children" and what percentage was just for plain old fun.
He reminds me of the 19th century elixir salesmen. Feed them enough laudanum to make them feel good until their dead.
His video about Halloween candy is a classic.
Is that why he was willing to sell them other items?
You seem to be taking what you see as the intent of the golden rule and using it in place of the wording. You're resolving the ambiguity in your head according to a certain method that is internal to you.
Since no one actually has "Godly morals" in my opinion, that makes us all equal. We are ALL bound by ourselves to be good. It's worked for the vast majority for over a hundred thousand years, most of which your particular brand didn't even exist.
WRONG MARXIST CUNT!
Now you are frustrated because you have been exposed as a dolt yet again.
They can see each other as much as they want - in their homeland.
No, it is an entirely different subject.
The stories y?all are sharing are truly awful. I?m a pediatrician, and I?d have to say that many of my colleagues are clinical dimwits and are too dependent on technology to make diagnoses. I used to oversee family practice residents in a hospital setting, and it was sometimes bad. I consistently had residents tell me that a baby breathing 60 times a minute was well-oxygenated because the pulse-ox said so. HINT: When a baby breathes 60 times a minute, they?re compensating for low blood oxygen. The pulse-ox only goes down when their compensatory mechanisms fail. Then you?re in BIG trouble.
Lol nice range
There is no tear gas coming out of that and she throws like a girl
I'm not sure that being against superstition in any way affects the sciences and how they do their work. Unless they are actively suppressing evidence for god when, just as an example they are studying evolution. So as an example, the religious claim that in evolution there are irreducible elements that could not have come about without intent... The flagella or the eye as 2 examples. Science looks at these claims and shows that in fact they are not irreducible. That's not an antireligious bias. That's science putting right a bunk claim.
Don't religious people generally posit that God created everything from nothing?