It depends on who you are talking to and what youre asking. IF you use the same old regurgitated dog chasing its own tail argument of "prove your God exists" welp, thats probably why.
That's you waiting for evidence your religion exist outside your "wishful" thinking.
Then let's stay tuned to see if they get off.
Interesting. I hadn?t heard the use of the terms disposer or placer before. I tried to confirm it but couldn?t using my usual sources. That doesn?t mean you are incorrect, just that it?s not readily verifiable for me.
I'd pound the one on the right.
Just a cold hard fact.
America rewarding kdnappers, torturers and murderers.
All the exclamation marks make you extra credible. Right?
It's up to the owners who plays on their team obviously they don't want Kaepernick so...
So, you dont think they should be persecuted because of their behavior? That isnt what you wrote. I would never suggest something so intellectually deficient against any group. Why? Because that kind of rhetoric insinuates justified violence or harrassment.
anyone remember when their mother changed their diapers?
Astrology, like religion was a popular way to historically explain the unexplainable. Astronomy has replaced astrology like science has better answers for what religion once explained.
Human made justice.
You make a claim: "reality gives us reason to believe WE are tuned to exist here"
Do you know how to say something intelligent?
go all the way!!!
I never actually mentioned anything about government controlling thought or beliefs or behavior.
I think there's a Luke Skywalker meme about the force... isn't there?
So, because there are many stories, you're 100% certain there's no intelligent creator being?
Learn how to tell the difference between assumptions and reality. That article is about assumptions.
Which has what to do with the article?