Yes we understand that because you don't like Trump that you think it's perfectly fine for media to print complete anti-Trump falsehoods.
They have no will nor capability to end it!!!!!!!
I honestly believe if she took a competency test, she would score at a 5th grade level.
You are misunderstanding the circumstances. The saints are converted to have love for God and intentional harmony with Him and mankind. That leads to a total disgust with our old nature, whether we repent or not. The attachments we now have to our close family and friends are seen to be misguided and evil insofar as they keep us from God, harmony and fellowship.
Mischevious, no. Monumental @sshat at the very least.
Excellent point. Using the first case as an example, the police will look for evidence that a crime was committed, which may exist, but never be found, exist and be found, or not exist at all. If it didn't actually happen, there certainly will be no evidence. If sufficient evidence is not found, it will be, for society, as if the theft never happened at all. It could be a lie; it could be a hallucination. The victim, in this case, is just SOL.
I would glance and then that would be all. If I ignored it, my wife would be like "Really, you didn't see that, I'm not stupid, I would do her." I would expect her to look as well if she seen some hunk walk by. I would joke about it with her. I was never one of those....."if you are married to me, I have to be the best looking guy on earth to you". That would be so sad. As long as you are not disrespectful to one another about it. What is that....making comparisons, not listening, drooling uncontrollably, etc...
Where did that word come from? do you use it often?
5' even and weighed about 120 pds.
Oh please. "God sent his only son so whoever did not believe in him would be tortured in hell forever and ever." God sacrificed himself to himself so he could then do something else, forgive sin. Yeah, who could know such a warped mind? The New Testament is the most obvious fraud ever. Jesus Christ never existed.
Not according to some, apparently.
I've seen it argued that one genealogy was through Joseph and one was through Mary.
Is it funny that I use the best dictionary instead of Google?
The above essay brings two things into thought:
But you were personally invited. That is not to be taken lightly.
Perhaps the label ?apologist? gets slapped when the behaviour is
Depeche Mode already covered this topic:
No, you are the one assuming that invisible things cannot exist. They can, and they can be understood by what has been made.
Okay, when I say human labour is valuable, I mean literally that it has a value. It is worth paying for because without it our society literally couldn't function.
The point is. Our legal system, our way of life, our western values would never stoop to that. We are far more tolerant than we give ourselves credit for. Those countries many you presume to defend do not reciprocate and if that doesn't tell you anything nothing will.
>>"How has science shown that God doesn't exist? "<<
Get some rest. When you feel rested you should ponder the implications of treating different people differently under the law. If you care to have a consistent ethics, and one should, then the unequal treatment of people should trouble you. The adage "rule of law, not rule of men" speaks directly to the arbitrariness and privilege that necessarily accompanies the "rule of men" as opposed to the consistent and equal "rule of law".