Great for some, not so good for others.
*Herpes more than likely lol. If they're reckless with their mouth probably reckless with that too smh
How can we determine that a person who
That's a topic for a different OP! lol
The exact nature of the divinity in/of Jesus was an the debate in early Christian councils. And it divided the church irreversibly. There were four views. Arian: that Jesus was basically human that enjoyed special gifts from God and a special message from God the father. Dyphysite: which became the Latin and Orthodox view that Jesus had two completely separate person[alities] that co-existed. This depended upon an element of Roman law that recognized a persona, something like a soul, but was untranslatable into Aramaic. The Monophysite view: what most eastern churches adopted, especially the Archbishops at Antioch and Alexandria, that Jesus had one special unified "soul" or "persona" that was completely unified and could not be separated. And the Nestorian view: That view predominated outside of the Roman Empire in Parthia and mostly Iraq.which said there were two completely separate phases which might appear appear at various times. So at one time Jesus appeared totally Human and at others totally divine. But probably not both appearing at any one time, although that is not clear.
You want him to extend something else ; )
It is often dead wrong on histroy. So its not much god as such a document. It gets too much wrong and makes cliams no other spurce backs
I wasn?t aware of that rule.
"There is nothing worse than Bad Arguments!!"
Finger wagging is fun
oh well, with 3 rings only.
Take care bro. Enjoy your Vacay
Lookin like Tommy Pickles out here
In the case of this specific channel, I'd agree. That said, it's not representative of my experience at other disqus channels for sure. Echo Chambers are a thing. I just don't think this is one.
Nope, I am not into conspiracy theories.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra needs to return to the private sector.
I don't choose to use such terms.
Your entire what should be the second paragraph is exactly supportive of what I said
You are saying the creature (man) was able to change the Creation. You are saying man ontologically separated himself from his Ground of Creation (God). How could that be possible, unless that was in God's plan?
At least FOUR more YEARS!!!!!!