That was how the cult leaders started it. Nobody has ever talked to or met a god. They are all fabrications.
Paul had an experience that apparently converted him on the spot and he had hated Christians and Christianity. Why would a god do that for him but not everyone else? Jesus even showed his open wounds to Thomas who doubted the resurrection. Yet the rest of us have to take the words of men on faith? No thanks.
The Ontario liberals have almost trippled the Ontario debt in 15 years. The federal government led by PM Crayola has almost trippled its yearly deficits and you have the gall to say the pc's are bad?
The system has to be dynamic in order to constantly renew itself and develop more advanced adaptions. Without those constant changes, life would still be mainly trilobites scuttling across the floor of the oceans.
"Christianity" does no such thing. People make those things happen and you haven't even bothered to try to show that they do so at a more frequent rate on account of their supernatural fantasies and delusions.
"Still no names of those mainstream historians who describe all past historical events as PROBABLE, including ostensibly the destruction of Pompeii as observed by Pliny the Younger shortly after its occurrence. Whether you like it or not, whether you admit it or not, YOU are the claimant. YOU have the burden of proof. If you can?t meet it, which you obviously can?t, you are a fraud. If you try to foist YOUR burden of proof off on me, as you have attempted, you are a cheat."
But but but. I can't get my wayyyyyy if I don't wiiiiiiiinnnneeee....
What facts are you talking about?
That is okay just two idiots talking to each other, the trump and the trudeau.
I understand civil rights. The case is trying to carve out an exemption for people like Jack who are artists...
There is such a thing as overpopulation. This planet cannot sustain an infinite number of humans, like say trillions. The purpose of humans shouldn't just be to "reproduce". We have intelligence. We're not effin' rats.
No, because it?s a matter of whether or not you ?can?t? or ?won?t?. In the case of the hard heart, I?d say your limitation is a ?can?t?. In the case of the stubborn head, your limitation is ?won?t?. So it?s not presumptuous. You either can?t or won?t see my logic and reasons for God.
"...from a Christian point of view, that would make zero God." Do you mean there would be no God, or that it would make God the zero? (as if he isn't enough of a zero already!)
I love how you wrote this XD
Well, the Earth does not actually have an overpopulation problem. Overpopulation is always a local issue, not a global one - and frankly the fact that Western nations almost uniformly have below-replacement birthrates (America is the only exception I know of) is one of the things driving the immigration debate.
What?? That is strange. I'll go to Discus Disqus and ask what's going on. Maybe they can fix this. Sorry you're having this problem.
I didn't say you shouldn't. It just proves what ive been saying in this thread. You people lose your shit when someone disagrees with you. Go ahead, lol, call me some more names...I will lose zero sleep over it.
"What they are saying is scientists and the relevent work in those feilds agree."
Okay. I'm a lifetime libertarian. I voted for Gary Johnson, Libertarian candidate.
I'm allowed to complain that they're all clowns! I declined my ballot!
Funny how first person testimony is worthless and yet people think it of value in convincing others. Secondly, you were lied to. The best your doctor can attest is its not "Very" painful. Not pain free.
products made from corn and soybeans.
But not because of their Catholicism. They did so based on their interpretation of Constitutional law.
The new Off Topic discussion is now open for the day:
Good day Rudiger.
Pointing out that the heir of a property acts as the owner is not saying that the heir is the same person as his father. That is nonsense. See in the scripture I cited "make not my Father's house". If my son calls my house as his own house, is he wrong? Is the temple not as much Jesus's house as his Father's house in the same way? Please don't lose sight of the point over grammar and semantics.
I explain it again. Read slowly.
"Let's be honest. [Complete load of crap]"
The penalty for blasphemy among Jews, was stoning done by other Jews after a trial before the Sanhedrin, and did not need Roman approval. Crucifixion was a Roman penalty for crimes against Rome, usually for sedition, murder of a Roman citizen or robbery, and the like. If Jesus was crucified, it was not for blasphemy.
I think you nailed it.
a virgin! good one! ;-)
Christ will never be received by the mainliners until he returns. He said so himself in John 15:18. To the skeptical he has never risen and so isn't 'bound tofall.'
Thank you. I know. I asked myself what would sis' want me to do?.
You shot down nothing. Copernicus did not suffer for his supposed "crimes." Neither, really, did Galileo. But if it makes you feel good to believe that, by all means, go ahead.