It is to avoid "the world", meaning any outside influence they think is bad.
Edison was atheist.
You just showed your profound ignorance of science.
Demisexual? That is a new term for me... Had to look it up.
It's a Trash Panda.
Lol, seen a few around here. They need to be on at least a F-350 dually 4wd. Out of place on a Ranger. Overcompensating? IDK.
When it?s time for the messiah, nothing will stop him from prospering.
Agreed. It?s too much. Also I would imagine it?s hard to get over a breakup continually spying on your ex
According to today's new "conservative," yes.
We don't disbelieve in dinosaurs just because people didn't start discovering them until the 19th century.
Then you must believe that I hate Christians too. But that's not the case.
Wait, what? Let me get this straight. You said that Adam didn't sin, he disobeyed. You, yourself don't call it sin because a sin is against a deity (God). By that, I assume you mean, God doesn't exist. You called him mythological. But you said that Adam disobeyed (and should presumably apologize).
Those votes are still there waiting to be uncovered. Why do you think democrats hand out provisional ballots and then never verify those voters?
Yes, a pedantic application isn't what's being discussed though at least by me. Just because I like broccoli doesn't mean I should give it to my fellows. Rather the choice of what vegetables to eat would be the 'rule' I would also recognize in others.
?They aren't babies until they're born? Boom. You just proved my point that y?all live in the land of make believe and think the magical birth canal assigns babyhood.
You're right that if your dad's not around you can't have a relationship with him. That's kinda why Jesus came to die in our place, so that the thing holding us back from God (sin) was paid for and no longer can keep us apart. I think what you're talking about (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that you want a relationship that doesn't involve faith. You have that choice, it's your prerogative. But God doesn't walk with us in flesh today because He wants faith to be a central part in our relationship with Him.
Nope to all of it.
Under the Roman Empire slavery was legal and integral part of their economy. Christians had nothing to do with the existence of slavery.
He was quite a guy.
So am I. To recap our conversation:
No, I was refuting your logical fallacy (now deleted, I see) that "if there's no real evidence for something you won't have any hard evidence against it either." To refute it, I provided an example of something that there was no evidence for, but much evidence against it being a real thing.
Could be the AmericanFreedom fighters. Who really knows.
Therefore they aren't targeted for being Christian. They aren't singled out for their Christianity. They are targeted because they are not in the same religion as the ones doing the targeting.
Fortunately, the space, time, technology window of opportunity for connecting with any intelligent alien life is so small that we are highly unlikely to ever come across any. The chances that another intelligent life form has evolved anywhere close to us in space, anywhere close to us in time and anywhere close to us in technology is vanishingly small.
Actually, they didn't "proceed to go to war with the US." The US invaded the CSA.
You may want him to feel better instead of being trapped.