Maybe one day the pendulum will swing back from this liberal moonbat socialist anti American social justice fad we are currently living it and we will have some sense of pride again.
"The only difference between a religion and a cult is its popularity in a culture."
I didn't make a claim, I made an argument.
So, good. Then you shouldn't have any problem with gay married couples, with or without children. Thank you.
You mean like this?
That is where I disagree.
That's what the shooters thought too more than likely
I thought you were talking about Charles Whitman.
Yep, people look - make their judgments [silently] and look away.
So are birds dinosaur family?
In your dreams, babybeeee. For the first time in years things are getting done and accomplished by our government. Too bad the Dems choose not to join in. Your loss ... our gain.
Who's arguing one is better? I'm arguing precisely the opposite.
THERE YOU ARE!!! Damn it's like a freaking reunion in the damn anti-abortion thread. Who would have thunk it.
No, I know about the maieutic method very well. You contradicted yourself many times, and I took the trouble to point out not only the contradictions but also the paralogisms.
You are looking at those cases with what you want to see instead of observing that character of the court and the trajectory of the decisions. While each of those decisions may appear narrow, it tells us how the court views those entities.
It isn't lack of drive on the part of the poor working class, it is the lack of opportunty provided by the job creators, that is the problem.
Think about so-called "people in poverty." Those who think most is determined before will advocate different policies. They will look at the welfariate differently than those who know that people make choices freely. The idea of responsibility for them changes. And on and on.
It may be evidence against the Genesis account if the Genesis account is taken word for word literally, but not if taken figuratively. The point of the Genesis accounts is not how the world was created, or how long it took, but by Whom.
No, it can but does not if the person is motivated to change. Much of the successes in transitioning to heterosexuality has been suppressed.
Science is all based on evidence. No evidence for god, no relevance.
I'm not talking about Jesus -- I am referring to his followers.
If scolding is the only tone that corrects a rebellious child, it would be unkind *not* to scold and admonish strictly and sternly.
No, I don't. I understand symbolism--but that isn't the issue here.
Yes, start with the Big Bang if you don't believe there is a God at all.
So you're telling me OKC, a team that couldn't beat the Jazz would beat the cavs in a series? And that Jazz team would beat the cavs? As well as the Blazers? Pelicans?? Lmao I guess man.
So again, yes or no please . Do you find Merriam Webster to be an authoritative source?
Yes, you are telling us your opinion of a first man and woman. So far, science doesn't support that.
Well, those points just make your argument seem even more foolish and ungrounded.
And Carroll is a physicist. Brilliant guy.
Respect those you respect you, older or younger, give no Fs about those who don't respect you, older or younger - but always try to do what's better for you in the long run - I think that's a more truthful and practical version or "respect your elders" XD
But in a sense yeah sure
yes turdeau gets off on that stuff
'Twas a badly placed joke, I guess. I kinda thought you'd like it.