Finland uses an educational system developed in the U.S.. It'd be nice if the U.S. adopted it, but still...
Ok, great. That translates to a 50 on the above scale.
define "self-created". What are the odds a butterfly is self-created from a caterpillar?
I was a christian for 35 years. Even as a christian I always wondered, really? the only way to help us is by drowning babies?
This is why you define it further. You define its purpose. such as increasing well being for all affected. With this basis, you can begin to determine what is moral and immoral. You can weigh decisions upon the harm and benefit those choices cause.
Oh, whoops... didn't know that.
I think you already know, unless you are the product of cloning and were just decanted, fully formed, yesterday.
But he isn't really looking at it from that point of view. He's looking at it from a straw man version of that point of view, and has every incentive to keep doing so.
Citation on the sentient molecules thing? And surely that
I still agree
What they found was earth-like life. Pretty specific one. And no, Mars is not fine-tuned for it.
Be careful what you wish for lest ye might get it and not want it after all.
How can one be jealous of someone or something they have never heard of?
Yes. There is evidence that I exist. Therefore my testimonial about my own beliefs are evidence. I believe in God. Thank you for making this evidence clear.
That's not the scenario, as I've already stated.
that would get into personal experience. I've seen some weird stuff in my 69 years of life.
No way. That would require them taxing their rich overlords more.
You mean young earth creationists. Please be specific. You continue to think there's only one kind for your strawman.
I addressed what you wrote and what you wrote alone. You make a fallacious argument then complain about where the thread has gone? Whats the definition of irony?
Maybe after you're done smearing autistic people you can explain how it is that your personal, private definitions of "deism" and "omnipotence" and "empirical knowledge" should be the operating definitions in our "conversation". Because if you don't, you're simply arguing that your emotional attachment to the way you use words is extraordinarily important to you. Which is interesting, from a psychological perspective about why humans hold irrational beliefs, but it doesn't tell me much else about whether there is evidence for God. And as has been said before, the fallacy of equivocation is one children literally use in kindergarten, and has no place in serious conversations.
First guess wrong. Care to try for #2?
He is a man in the earth in the body of a man like you and me. If you want to know, search the name and read what or watch what he has to say and decide for yourself.
Reality.... Mueller will if he has something - he is a real lawyer. The rest are PR stunts.
We have been discussing and you conveniently ignore scriptures or inject your own back story to discredit what is said clearly.
Talk about made up stories. Man does the taking
OK, well you can certainly consider factual information contained outside of the article, so why don't you take a look?
Q) Did Kanye say anything about slavery?
You do not know what I know about the bible, but when you add to this conversation that you believe a non-god figure called Satan who became a talking snake who tricked a woman to be disobedient, you don't move me to consider that it is I who am gullible.
I don't know about you, but I will do anything for love, but I won't do that.
Completed trust? Can you explain that? Because if that means what I think it does, then I don't have faith in anything.
I'm not here to convince you, and neither is anyone else, frankly. Only the Holy Spirit of God can convince or convert you.
The US is the largest economy on earth, we cannot lose a trade war! Who will They need us MORE than we need them!
While we Native Americans had our own wars, at least we were more honorable with our fights. We did not believe in slaughtering innocent women and children. We fought man to man.
Lynn Margulis was married to Carl Sagan before she went off the rails, and was once a respected scientist, but is now pretty much regarded as a fringe person.
Not as long as you post your pinchbeck philosophy.