Having rules against wearing nothing in public is not a form of oppression it is just a law which exists by the agreement of the population. The domestic oppression of women in the Moslem home is a domestic matter that needs addressing not ignoring or accepting.
And watch the NDP lose party status. Those LEAP Manifesto people would be poison.
I know about Marsh's work... it is mentioned quite often in the book I pointed out. The book I gave you will have to be read before you get it. You'll also note that it is among the primary sources for the links you provided regarding current scholarship.
Tacitus does not say he got his data from any historical record. It is you who is projecting authentic history onto a non-historical statement. And if Tacitus did not receive his data from a third party, from whom or what did he receive it? Obviously, not from catechesis, because he was not a Christian; nor from the Gospels, which are undocumented sources; nor from rumors about Christians, which are undocumented sources; nor from Christians themselves, which are also undocumented sources.
That?s a bit of a stretch. I would?ve considered the heavens to be anything above the clouds
"He should have no say so on the matter. "
He has been telling me for years that I am idiot believing that Napoleon Bonaparte was an Emperor.
If they are based on religion, and they are, they are unconstitutional
I believe automation and AI will eliminate the majority of employment in America over the next ten years. It's not science fiction anymore, everything from self driving vehicles to AI that eliminates the overwhelming majority of office personnel. AI works 24 hours a day 7 days a week, it doesn't get sick, it doesn't require health insurance or vacation time and eliminate mental fatigue. Whether its law offices or over the road cargo transportation, its an unemployment problem that's is inevitable, not speculative change.
No, no mention of dialectical materialism. You'll have to explain your meaning.
While I lean toward Kim's side -- how sure are you that none of those multiple emails didn't actually say "this is for the shoot, the pix cost extra"? Kim does not seem to be on top of things at all.
"Somehow or other, if you let this structure collapse, and I think it is collapsing, incidentally: it?s a house of cards built on some very bad concepts and some very poor science: poor because of the insistence that it is the only truth. If you let that crumble, what then happens?"
Let?s count how many people comment to say they don?t care lol
Neither do you.
Eman. Except that formless equates with having no shape and void equates with having no substance and the deep that was mentioned is something with both a shape and substance.
It's called leftist hypocrisy.
"So, tell me, being so great an expert, what makes Catholicism Christian?"
No, it merely means that men are incorrect because God cannot be incorrect.
I can't stop worrying about her and the pets - that's my only real issue, I don't want to be with her, but I want her to be alright XD
i had a rabid mom call me about a student who in her opinion was the golden child.
What fun they're having!
^^ really is this fucking stupid
Thats hyperbole. Its not like when someone goes in for an abortion the doctors ask "why are you here?" There is no way to track the actual reasons people have.
The same thing happened to the Olde Red Hen in Collingwood, Ontario, Canada.
All of this, it?s sobering
Are the only options "support and respect my decisions" or "your a homophobic bigot"?
More of an oxymoron--sort of.
You didn't provide a source, I did.
How about this situation: