= "I don't know, I have no competence whatsoever, but I blindly believe that these are all conspiracies."
That would be fine with me. It's one thing to give a quick kiss goodbye it's another thing to see how far your tongue can go down the other person's throat. Some things should just be private
hmmm...what topics trigger men? We should make a list
I'm not sure I agree. I might say a different standard, not higher standard, because an atheist insisting he is more rational is based on the rather obvious fact one can't prove the current Judeo-Christian God exists, and is acting upon some other more tactile evidence upon which to base conclusions. The religious simply uses faith, and attempts to claim that because he KNOWS God exists and the Bible is his word, his actions are rational based on that premise.
The issue is less the "formed from clay" thing itself and more that Genesis shows humans being created from scratch as a separate thing to the rest of the animal.
Rob was a drunk and a drug addict. They are both choices, not a disease. And even if you could convince me they are a disease Doug was an enabler by denying any issue existed which actually exacerbated Rob's downward spiral.
He could claim anything he wanted. Clearly his behavior was counter every single teaching of Catholicism and Protestantism. So what he may have claimed goes no further than the claim.
I have no idea.
Wait....there's the solution! Initiate a documentation check at every point of purchase for every item sold here: food, gasoline, household goods, etc....A variation of "No tickee, no payee". Donnie can order a Yuge fleet of ICE vans and cattle trucks to have within 1/2 mile of every business and pay for it with savings from the Yuge damages the "illegals" have wrought on us.
The both are smarter than you so
It's in both. Try to read the KJV version, though - it's gibberish.
In the Iliad and Shakespeare, evil is not presented as if it were good. But if you view the Bible as inspired and good, period, then you are presented with a God who is often evil by any objective measure, unless you exempt him from all rules about good and evil, in which case, of what use is it to describe him as "good?"
*shuffling papers, stacking folders*
aaaand, thats what she SAID!
What you mean to say is you only want to think the story is fake and you have no proof to support your desire to call it fake.
Had the baker refused to sell anything to the couple or asked them to leave, you'd have a good comparison. But, that is not the case. So, nice try.
The indoctrinated tend to stay indoctrinated, no surprise.
I knew it was DG from the second I saw tits in the title.
Your applying your own context.
The physical realm consists of all things that are subject to the laws of physics and which are measurable by empirical scientific methods.
Actually sane Americans can tell that this is a hoax perpetuated by the leftstream media, which is why we?ll continue to vote the way that we have been. Thanks for playing, though... and be sure to wear protective gloves when grasping at straws!!
Good Lord, get a room people !!! Too cheap for a motel.
It's a parent's job to teach their kids how to best survive in society. What is and is not attractive is part of that. Some people believe it's a more vital part then others do.
Diversity of life? Easy...read genesis. Two by two began the original families. Lots of speciation but since has slowed way down, perhaps because of accumulation of mutation.
If none practiced the ideology, it would not exist. If we see Sharia rise all over the world in the recent 50 years (and actually throughout all history except around 1850-1950), it means the ideology has a lot of influence. If we see a harmful influence, does it matter how many Muslims don't follow it, or follow only partically? Even if it's 1 out of 100, it doesn't turn Islam into a peaceful doctrine compatible with modern world.
You presented good and accurate summaries of the "other historians" evidence. The only problem is that everyone has already heard it, and they refuse to listen.
Just as I suspected. You asked for peer review research from scientific journals. I provide such research and you reject it, not because it isn't peer reviewed (Journal of Human Sexuality is a peer-reviewed publication) but because of who publishes it. NARTH is a science based organization unaffiliated with any church or religious group.
Actually, you made a fallacious claim, that I challenged, and you still haven't been able to back up. I didn't "[feign] ignorance of the numbers", I said you made assumptions about my intelligence and what you called evidence that weren't merited.
No, that is merely your uneducated opinion.
What is the use? To establish whether Christianity has been lying to us all on two fronts:
Let's see Drake put on that sort of performance. Bet he thinks a flute is something that you put a beer shot in.