So you agree it is unacceptable discrimination based on the bakers homophobia and is not to be supported.
??Bruh, I'm convinced your a virgin...
There's no need to be tetchy Steve, I'm just wondering how I could tell the difference between you gaining knowledge about God by way of personal insight, and wishful thinking
I can understand that, but then you say you want them to leave you alone and just be over it. It would have been over had you not responded.
"If someone's quality of life is increased by coming to America, I say come, legal or otherwise" Ok, so if someone is a violent murderer, you support them coming to America since their life would be improved?
Ah , now I remember you... You still have nothing to say ...
Having done the reading to prep for this conversation: I came to the conclusion what actually did in Rome was taxing the patricians too lightly and the citizens too heavily.
Don't believe crap from the white nationalist backed Townhall rag. Townhall is a hotbed for right wingnut paranoia.
Funny how even your b.s. rags haven't found anyone to corroborate this big story. This includes the failure by Sanders herself to mention it, much less anyone on her party, or anyone having witnessed this "protest". I call b.s. on both generations of lying hucksters. Huckster Sara sure doesn't seem like a shrinking violet when it comes to crowing about how she feels wronged. Why do YOU think she forgot the juiciest part of the narrative?
That would be nice, need to cut the budgets of just about everything.
That's because we had machines that could do the work for us. We transferred who was doing the labour from people, and then decided that it wasn't right to have them as property.
And NO limitations were found.
Where's the evidence that Christ existed? Your rant "no evidence" is at least on point because THERE IS NONE. Your silly claim that no evidence will will convince me is in the absence of any evidence to attempt to do so. So it's really just a self serving comment without merit. As I said before, disproving Atwill is not proving that a historical JC existed. Also, you keep switching to the existence of "Christianity" instead of "Christ" as if they are one in the same. So do you not understand that they aren't one in the same or don't understand the context of this thread.