There are rules for posting articles here. The summary has to be from the article itself to summarize the contents. I don't get to add my own words in the summary otherwise I certainly would have explained the only pic in the article, and the one I used, was the only one contained in the article. That's why I've been here explaining in the comments to folks that the pic is of the victim.
That's a pretty clear violation of the rules, don't you think?
Germany is an ally because of the law?
Humility? In sense he know best why millions of kids yearly have to die from starvation? He know best why just one passenger survived and all others died?
The Bible has a creator while the Veddas have a disintegrator. Who's to say one is right and the other wrong?
Not always. Many break.
Couldn't care any less.
That's some wild stuff Steve, I love it!!
Yeah... I'd be saying the exact same thing if I'd just got my arse rhetorically handed to me.
" submission to His will, and it's beautiful"
That makes an assumption that the supernatural cannot exist, and I believe it would be a lapse in logic to assume a natural cause for everything.
It's Make America Great Again, NOT make the rest of the world great again.....
Because "separate, but equal" was already shown to be BS.
that's fine. that's your preference. i have no desire to extend the human beings' reign on earth, and so i won't be helping you.
I?d have to wear an eye patch, of course ...
I've seen a few people saying that almost exactly.
I think you need to learn history but then again, atheist are the most ignorant people on earth. Here I'll post it again, this time look at the list and then google the history.
So then you don't read the news and you aren't aware of the law that went into effect this year which essentially holds all message board owners responsible for the content generated on their platforms. Not sure how to break it to you, but no, it's not the same as 100 years ago. But you keep pretending it is. I'm sure that'll be a really interesting legal position.
No. I'm saying your question appears to be a straw man put forth in some unsophisticated attempt to rationalize an apparently misguided perception that Christians are somehow unfairly persecuted... But, if you can point me to a particular forum where atheists in general can't distinguish a fundamentalist from a moderate in any religion, let alone compare and contrast them to one another and I can see that evidence for myself, then I might be compelled to acquiesce to your point of view.
Star Trek might be a better resource in this sense.
Pretty good turnaround time. And very good copypasta (not saying that it isn't your writing). Thanks.
This is what I think of whenever anyone shares that terrible xkcd comic about 'showing you the door'. Like, the notion that you are totes free, for realsies, but you'll be fired if you don't toe the line is just pernicious.
Well, if money permits and you have the time to tend to them, I definitely think there needs to be something along the walk.
Nice. Demonstrate I am wrong by just asserting it. Care to try for another logical fallacy?
?Dammit Jim! I?m a scientist not a baker!!?
How did that even make sense in your head. Seriously dude, try college!