He's only left 2 teams man..,lol
Not negligent homicide either, since care was taken to save lives. It's what we call an unfortunate circumstance.
American Atheist website does.
Gas prices are through the roof!!
And again more hate speech
You are right. I do treat those as the same thing.
LOL..just like I thought. Your ignorant, racist white supremacist a s s cannot defend your bs and deflection is all you have to hide your ignorance. LOL..you have nigger blood white boy.
Science knows nothing, makes nothing, does nothing. The hammer does not build the house, the person builds it using the tool we call a hammer. Science is a tool that is entirely invented by humans. We use it to explore, define and enumerate the detectible universe. By itself, it does nada, niente, nuttin'.
But the specific passages about not eating shellfish you let slide. And the specific passages about not trimming your sideburns you let slide. And the specific passages about not wearing clothes of mixed fibers you let slide.
Then God has every right to judge you which rather closes in a neat circular way your argument.
Some have argued here that they never got to discuss design. If that's the case, how do you know that they ordered a "traditional" wedding cake or had a traditional wedding cake in mind?
Agreed, but I'm so cynical since for so long many just get away with it.
I think I phrased myself badly. Dan's point was a historical Jesus existed, there was no need for him to defend a biblical Jesus.
Solid 6. There is always the possibility that there is Something out there that takes an interest in humanity and is either magical. . .or so very advanced that Its technology is indistinguishable from magic. The interactions of this Entity (possibly an entire civilization or researcher, etc.) has lead to the mythos. An actual God as described in the Judeo/Christian/Muslim mythology. . .including creating the entire universe. . . .ZERO.
Yes being the baby is an innocent party. But if you support the mother killing that baby because she so chooses for convenience, then you cant logically object to the rape or incest in the first place. Both subject an innocent weaker party to unjust suffering at the whims of the more powerful party in the equation. Both are offensive and gravely immoral
Impeach them why?
Isn't that forbidden in your religion, you sinner!