It should have stayed there.
The fallacy is commonly called the argumentum ad verecundiam or argumentum ad auctoritatem. An argument from an authority- in this case an argument from a god that's yet to be demonstrated to conclusively exist.
mange la sac
then why are you obsessed with the picture and ignoring the real life problem? You obviously don't care that little girls are being sold into sex slavery all over the world only that they got the picture wrong.
So science can not claim to have no need for fairies or unicorns until they test for them?
What about coke zero eh? Need I say anymore!
Bob and Weave.
Yep. Agree. It is a step by step Replacement as every person accepts the better Reality in Jesus vs his own. And in this case it is the Replacement of the last to walk totally in the Life of Jesus. This is the second coming and a possibility for any Child who reach Maturity in Christ. This is desired because then the Kingdom Ruling is manifested on earth. And the earth sure needs it right now before human selfish, unwise ruling is totally destroying it. So "Oh Yeah" should rather cheer us on because there lies the future of this planet and his too.
I'm always pressured to hold the door open for some ungrateful wife that rears my children!
So you deflect. LOL, no proof?
There are writings outside of Biblical...Coptic Bible...( Thomas ) where it speaks of YESHUA's ( Jesus) childhood....He was to have thrown a friend off a roof and killed him but brought him back to life.... and other stories....More Theology....?
RA1. I was going to post earlier but apparently a god or ghost ravaged a loaded peach tree last night and I had expend effort to cut and prune it back as my praying in the name of Jesus did not miraculously restore my peach tree.
That's not the scenario, as I've already stated.
I don?t have to go out of my way to read your words in bad light. I just illuminate the truth of your words. Under the superficial light that makes abortion look like a wonderful blessing to women, the actual truth is abortion hurts women. Likewise under the superficial light that life is a grand party, the actual truth often paints life with a different brush, and it?s not the party brush. You?re infected by materialism and the ?light? of your words are poison. You?re well liked around here because of your superficial ?light?, so your party analogy was spot on for YOUR current life. While most around here ignorantly drink the poison, you know better. Whether you were baptized or not, I know you have a seed of faith which is why you WANT to agree with me that we have souls. But as long as you cling to your atheism, you?ll remain an ape at a party.
Low IQ showboating. That treaty was never valid because it did not have a 2/3 Senate majority.
To Trump, everyone is equally inferior to him, and perhaps his family who are also inferior to him.
"can you please define specific metrics as to what "agreeing with the founders" means?" - posted by JusrinnWyatt
"There was no 'Latin nationalism' that caused the split in the Empire."
It isn't a sincere apology, Gillette. That would require you to actually fix your actions, which you haven't. You keep mis-spelling Niamh's name as if it isn't literally on your screen when you respond to her.
Christ will do it anyway.
Some people don?t like soft serve ??!??!?
The writers of the Cambridge Companion to Jesus don't claim to know what this Jesus of yours said, for one because the Gospels were written well after the events they describe, Mr. (ha! ha!) History Buff). So guess who needs straightening out, especially with respect to his honesty.