I have a degree in chemistry and have done chemical research and am pretty well studied (informally) in climate science. I tend to focus on the physical science and paleoclimatology in my study. I have already refuted your April was the coldest month since 1895 claim.
His words are faithfully recorded.
I have, and that's why I have the opinion I have.
Thank you for your kindness. ???????
LMAO nice analogy!
Please see my latest answer to J Adams. I am not saying that it is outside the realm of possibility. I'm just not sure that there is any way for us to know that such a revelation was genuinely a godly revelation and not something mundane.
You might want to clarify your comment.
Glad you support her.
Sure. I lie all the time. Usually so as to not offend someone, and thereby save myself a future headache. Like pretending to actually give a damn about what my wife's nephew has been up to recently.
Some parts are to be taken literally and some figuratively. It's been that way for more than 1600 years since the Catholic Church defined the Christian canon of Scripture (the Bible).
Arguably Judaism has contributed much to western history and thought, oh but racism right?
what about gay geman men with liquid roofies?
Why wouldn't you believe that God made the first two to start populating the Earth, but some of those offspring were gay by design to be a natural guard against overpopulation and limited resources? Why is it impossible that God created the hetero couples to have children and the gay couples to give homes to children that could not be cared for due to unforeseen circumstances? Either God is unlimited and made everything, as claimed in the Bible (and if these beings displeased him so he could have made sure that NONE existed) or the Bible is lying.
No. I suggested manners, deference to people, and sensitivity to the sensibilities of others. Civilized behaviors, in other words.
Not about the homosexuals. It was about the baker not wanting to sin. I have repeated that probably 35-40 times. I know you will not accept it but that it what happened, even if you refuse to accept that reality.
You should. Your ?? says you're sleepy. :) Thank you for my medal, any timeline on my statue?
Stay hip, Grandma ;-)
The constitution is clear.
I read how it is defending something different than the verse in question. It is trying to reconcile previous prophecy with the outcome stated in that verse.
Shall I remind you that the moto was...... "either you believe in (or convert) or I kill you"!
I'm sorry how does plasticity disprove evolution? If that is what happened here, and I'm not seeing that said specifically in your quotes, then it doesn't disprove genetic changes passed on to offspring, i.e. descent with modification, as a method of evolution.
How do Mormons reconcile "Black people weren't really human until God changed his mind in the 1970s" I mean... I assume that's largely glossed over... but there it is.
There being no God as an argument is not really a negative, it would be just Zero.
As it I understand it, that's what you believe.
He created us.If you create a sentient being who insists on being not following your mercy, what are yo going to do?
Got a citation for that?
One chooses to limit one's experiences to insure a good working society and the continuation of your own people. It is the salvation of your people, your nation, your extended family, your clan that is the promise.
I have made a statement, you argued against that statement, therefore that statement I made is wrong so prove it.
"How did you conclude that time will end? What happens to God then?"
By all means hoard all your assets, retreat to your small world and make the best of what makes you happy. As an atheist I am drawn to a bigger picture.
I posted a wikipedia link. Supposebly there was a case not long ago where a woman definitely had two kids from two people a few weeks apart.
Does the word of God tell you that? I mean to you, doesn't the Bible supersede science?
No. Jesus was the Great Servant.