I dont care what the fall out was about to be honest. I wouldn't just nonchalantly shrug off a movement (not just one person, a large portion of people) that presumes to think they can threaten, silence, hurt, denigrate and punish you only because you make the mistake of thinking for yourself.
Actually, I've found Libertarians (not liberals) to be much more supportive of the free flow of international labor.
I'm sure if you asked the creep's wife, she'd say otherwise.
And here we go with the self obliviousness once again. You could corner the market.
I got ya. I hammered the last three in one post. Presidents make it so easy to do.
Actually, I think I meant 'mainstreamers.'
My debauching days are over too. I do have some memories of very long lunches.
In related news...
You're confused. Donald is not Rudy. Rudy is not Donald. Get it?
What is it you think our God says that rules out any form of change, variation, adaptation, selection?
What does a 'thank you" from Trump get you?
Maybe some day you'll worry less about how the questions are crafted and more about the substance of the OP.
Indeed. My point was the subject of the picture, not the goofy writing attached.
I need more caffeine but I've had so much at this point already that I'm afraid more will be harmful.
Evolution is not something one "believes" in. That's not how science works It does not require faith. We can overbearing evolution every day. The "purpose" of evolution has nothing to do with any god.
Believe it or not, I?ve been described as an old soul.
I've not seen a report from someone who was there.
Nothing is evolving. Period. We never had a common ancestor with any animal.
Well, one of the key rationale's for granting tax exempt status to churches, besides the fact that the donations their members give have in most cases already been taxed, is so they can give tax exempt status to other not religious groups that perform charitable work, to encourage that kind of grass roots outreach which is considered to be a good thing. If only non religious charitable work was tax exempt, that would be a kind of discrimination against religious groups, and a violation of the 1st Amendment. So all groups defined as charitable are treated the same. It makes it possible for folks to deduct their donations to the Red Cross and the like, as a kind of carrot by the government to make those kind of donations. But it must include religious charitable work to be fair under our system.
Why should government be able to tell you who you can or cannot marry?I don't think government should issue marriage licenses, just record the marriage.
Are Oklahoma's gun measures more or less stringent than New York City's?
Heh. See the second video clip I posted below.
Your definition went from very narrow to very broad, very quickly. That definition of Christianity is so broad, it includes Muslims, Jews, Unitarians, Manichaeans, Bahai, and others I'd have to go through a list of obscure religions to even name. Taken to an extreme, it could even refer to anyone who believes in a God who has a hand in history.