My main point is, why not reach a conclusion based on what the available evidence indicates. That's all. With history, we're never going to reach a conclusion with absolute certainty. Historiography doesn't ever *try* to do that. All we can ever do is establish levels of probability, try to establish an explanation that A) Fits the evidence B) Doesn't depend on any un-evidenced speculation (as best we can, at least).
Here is a record that actually maters
1. Homosexuals, transsexuals, etc. should not have special rights. That undermines rule of law, of course.
Everything is coincidence, with you distinct imbeciles.
"Over the top reaction"? lol ok
Another comment like that and you are done here,
Ok, I see what you mean. I think the idea of reverence and not adoration is a common theme in response to my question. Thanks!
Right. He writes for the Star, a noted left wing extremist publication. Even if he were a credible journalist it would be difficult to accept this as being anything but a political smear job coming from the Toronto version of Pravda .
I think you're double counting some people in that balance.
It violates the 1st Amendment.
Brady's son will take over when Tom finally decides to hang em up
I think youre going to have to show me. Dont throw dates at me with zero context...otherwise its worthless impov
Yes, you HAVE assumed, blatantly. Yes, YOUR ignorance. Words have defined meaning. You do not get to redefine said words to suit your purpose.
There's nothing wrong with BDSM really. When done properly (IE, not 50 Shades of Grey crap) it can be really healthy, fun, and the sub is the one with all of the control. And consent is given.
"I seen the video, they had time."
French Jews are not all leaving left leaning parties for right leaning parties. They are often leaving France. In the long term, The Republican Party does not necessarily stand to gain from Jews leaving the Democratic Party, if they also leave America.
If there?s no god then no. We may go about our business. If there is, we are given a choice.
But there are Christians who aren?t catholic or Protestants.
Oh. That's not so bad.
Of course it is. R Kelley and his fetishes are offensive but far from the most damaging or misogynistic behavior engaged in by "artists" over recent decades, and going back to the 50s.
I only go with the Biblical account and Jesus' character.
I agree. When we die, one or both of us will be wrong. If I am right, then neither of us will know.
And that?s why we got to keep those monsters chained inside the dungeon.
It isn't about protecting religious liberty. It is about protecting everyone's rights. If he can be a bigot towards gays he can later target atheists.
No, but is a death by a means other than gun worse than a death by gun?
She don't need no fancy spellin'.
I hear you! It scared and appalled me as well - before I accepted Christ as my savior.
What about them? They are fed their scraps from the table of the elites, exactly what they've resigned themselves to.
Saturday night gangbang, church on Sunday?
No. It would not.
I do hope you are on here in November so I can say? I told you so ?
The moral foundation of Christianity is not "God killed Jesus as an act of mercy." The gospels are very clear on this.
You don't think that changes my point, do you?
Lol I'm leaving it so this makes sense.